User talk:Spchjok

Clinical Trials Unit

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Clinical Trials Unit, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.clinicaltrialsunit.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clinical trial ‎

I have removed the additions you made to Clinical trial because they were copied word-for-word from another website. This type of plagiarism and/or copyright violation is not permitted on Wikipedia. If you wish to add content to Wikipedia, you must write in your own words. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Clinical Trials Unit. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Clinical Trials Unit. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Clinical Trials Unit, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Clinical Trials Unit, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Ged UK 09:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fresh start

Hello, Spchjok, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Community interaction

Hi. I'm sorry that your first experiences have been frustrating. I know from my own days as a newcomer that I did not quite understand how interactive the community was. The first time somebody left me a message at my IP address (as I was then not registered) was rather more alarming than anything else. Even though it was a friendly message, I didn't understand how they had tracked me down. :)

Behind the articles that everyone sees is quite a lot of chatter here among the people who work on them on all manner of subjects related to how to best develop content. The only hint of this in article space is the "maintenance templates" such as were placed on Clinical trials unit. These are there to point out problems with articles that contributors can then fix. Sometimes we don't all agree that an issue is a problem. With something like the "no footnotes" notice, it's really indisputable — you either do or do not have footnotes. If you don't, you add them and then remove the template. With things like "neutrality" templates, the situation may be less clear, and it is common in cases to use the article's talk page to discuss why you do or do not agree with the template.

In addition to article talk pages, every contributor - registered or not - has a userpage just like yours. You can find out who placed a template by looking in the article's page history. If the template itself isn't clear to you, you can ask them directly at their talk page what they perceive the problem to me. You have to be friendly or at least professional when you do this, mind. The "consensus process" (the point of all that conversation) doesn't work if we can't maintain a certain level of civility, and we have a number of behavioral policies to help ensure we do.

One of the conceptual challenges that I sometimes encounter in people who are familiar with working on the web is the community ownership practiced on Wikipedia. In most of the world, you can expect some kind of control over content you publish, but in Wikipedia that's not the way it works. Not only does the community review each other's edits and note problems with it, but anyone can edit what you write. Sometimes this can be a little frustrating, if you disagree with the work of another, but the basic Wikipedia principal is that by allowing anyone to contribute, we can work towards neutral, reliable content...sometimes after a lot of conversation. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/King's Clinical Trials Unit.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! B music ian 00:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/King's Clinical Trials Unit concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/King's Clinical Trials Unit, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:56, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission King's Clinical Trials Unit

Hello Spchjok. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled King's Clinical Trials Unit.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/King's Clinical Trials Unit}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:02, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]