User talk:Spate's Catalog
Give me a day or two to get back to you with some quotes from a few secondary sources I have regarding the etymology of the term, and we can take it from there, together. How does that sound? ---kilbad (talk) 16:41, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Fine by me. If it really means "rough", then by all means it should stay. Spate's Catalog (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have not forgotten... fyi. ---kilbad (talk) 01:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Now that I have had a chance to look into that fact, I realize I was not the editor who had added it. I apologize for the delay, but after reviewing all of the derm texts I own, and PubMed, I am unable to verify the fact in question; therefore, completely support its deletion! Thanks again for your help! ---kilbad (talk) 20:15, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
List of skin-related conditions nominated as featured list candidate
[edit]I have continued to work on the list of skin-related conditions, and recently nominated it for FL status. If available, your comments would be greatly appreciated at the nomination page. Regardless, thank you again for your work on wikipedia. ---kilbad (talk) 06:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)