User talk:Spartathreehundred

WP:3RR on Gautama Buddha

PLease review the policy. You have already switched back to the Nepal version three times. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Maya Devi temple-Nepal.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Maya Devi temple-Nepal.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 07:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Maya Devi temple-Nepal.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Maya Devi temple-Nepal.jpg. The copy called Image:Maya Devi temple-Nepal.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 08:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:BirthPlaceLumbini.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. Thanks for uploading Image:BirthPlaceLumbini.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. Thank you. HermesBot 07:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Pic006Lumbini.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:BirthPlaceLumbini.jpg. The copy called Image:BirthPlaceLumbini.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 08:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Checkuser confirmed that you have been using sockpuppets to evade 3RR and to revert war. In light of this, as well as using another sock to vandalise userpages, I have blocked this account for 5 days. If you wish for this decision to be reviewed, please consult WP:APB. ~ Riana ⁂ 02:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Pic006Lumbini.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Pic006Lumbini.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim 1357 ^talk 05:16, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]