Jump to content

User talk:Spartan008

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you realise that your last edit to the 2010 FIFA World Cup squads completely reverted the edit that I made immediately before you? – PeeJay 10:44, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:MOSHEAD for the reason why I have removed the links from the section titles. The page states, "to avoid accessibility problems, headings should not normally contain links". Furthermore, the section titles should not contain flags either as it stops the sections from being properly linked to in article histories. – PeeJay 06:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Bub"? Seriously? Who do you think you are: Wolverine? – PeeJay 20:59, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well to be fair, you were the one who started the edit war. Strange that you later claimed you weren't going to get into an edit war with me, but it's funny how one's memory starts to fail when you find yourself in the wrong, isn't it? – PeeJay 01:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2006 AFC Challenge Cup squads - Philippines

[edit]

In the Philippines the surname "de la Cruz" has been "Philippinized". Therefore there are people whose last name is "dela Cruz". Although there are others with "de la Cruz". In the case of the Filipino player Wilson in the Challenge Cup squad, he's "Wilson dela Cruz" not "Wilson de la cruz." As for Andres Gonzalez, although there is no article for him, there's Andrés González with a page. Banana Fingers (talk) 20:44, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Some fixes, article is still pretty poor"

[edit]

You visited one of the articles I am working on said the article is still pretty poor? I don't mean to be a jerk or combative about this but why would you even say that? Are you grading the article or just taking pot shots at contributors? I could just edit other people's work if I wanted but I am choosing to try to add something to the articles. I think you should maybe consider other people's time and work before flippantly degraded it. Morry32 (talk) 06:01, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What suggestions would you make to improve the article? Thank you for the apology. Morry32 (talk) 15:22, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 FIFA World Cup squads

[edit]

Care you offer your opinion on this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2010_FIFA_World_Cup_squads#Vladim.C3.ADr_Weiss_club_affiliation

Zzsignup (talk) 01:28, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Zzsignup (talk) 00:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lausanne-Sports

[edit]

No problem. I've been trying to improve the coverage of Russian football and they just knocked one Russian team out and play another Russian team in the Europa League group. Geregen2 (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines national football team

[edit]

Your "clarification" is not constructive. For the current squad, nothing changed and you named it as the squad for the qualifiers even though the final squad hasn't even been announced yet! You also removed the "goals" column, and there are still a few players who's caps are wrong, when at this moment in time their caps are unknown. For the recent call-ups, you've completely changed it. As mentioned, it is a section for players that have been part of the FINAL SQUAD for a match or tournament within the last 12 months. Not for players that are part of a provisional squad. The template should also be "nat fs r player" and not "nat fs g player". Therefore, there should be no squad numbers and a column "latest call-up" would be there. Again, you also removed the "goals" column when it should also be retained. On top of all that, you also removed a completely different section I added called "Team image". Banana Fingers (talk) 18:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proper protocol?? Show me the relevant discussion or the proper manual of style for the use of that template where this protocol is stated. The pages for the national teams where there are specific wiki football projects don't seem to be following this supposed protocol. Also, you changed the style and yet you didn't even maintain the correct number of caps for each player. It's not the 19th anymore! Banana Fingers (talk) 20:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Those are for squad pages. This isn't a squad specific page but a national team page. Other national team articles also list the squad by position which includes the caps AND goals count. And for the recent call-ups section, like I've said before, that section is for players who have made it to the final squad for a match or tournament. No players that have only been in the provisional squad should be listed. Banana Fingers (talk) 20:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

[edit]

What is it with you? So you don't list the attendance on 2010 AFF Suzuki Cup qualification because there is no consistency? Is this another one of your made up "protocols"?? Just as you have done for the squad for the Philippines national football team page? So what if the other match reports do not mention the attendance? If it's mentioned in the match report it should be listed. Unless you show me an actual ruling within wp:football that this new protocol of yours must be followed, it should be listed. Banana Fingers (talk) 17:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So now you're labeling me as the know-it-all??? Funny! Because I was thinking the exact same with you and you're also getting on my nerves. You're the one trying to enforce self-made protocols that aren't even protocol at all! By you doing that, that's also your way of saying that the standards/protocols that are in place aren't good enough, so you've taken the liberty and created and enforced your own. That's a slap in the face to Wikpedia and a slap in the face to other editors/contributors such as myself. So who's the know-it-all now?? Banana Fingers (talk) 18:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So much for "letting each other be" huh?? This time it's the 2006 Challenge Cup. Have you actually had a proper look at the match reports?? Because in those match reports, beside each player's name is the name they go by in brackets which most likely would've been on the back of their jersey as well. And when listing the scorers, that's usually the name that is listed, right?? Eg. Palestine: Fahed Attall as a scorer would be "Attal" but the reports list him as "F. Attal", India: Vimal Pariyar would be "Pariyar" but they usually go with their first names and that's what the reports list him as, simply "Vimal". So tell me what I've done wrong now?? I also fixed pen takers for Sri Lanaka vs Nepal but you undid my revision. So....... Banana Fingers (talk) 18:08, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oooohhhhhhh..... I'm so sorry your highness, it will never happen again. pfff. You and your "I really like cleaning up other people's messes". So you you're better than everybody else... whatever!! Piss off!! Oh and "messes"?!? lol!! Banana Fingers (talk) 16:51, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2012 AFC Challenge Cup qualification

[edit]
  • The note in Group B is redundant. Malaysia being the host for that group is stated at the top of the Group stage section. The same reference is also used. I was also the one who did that revision.
  • I'm guessing you're not familiar how the fixtures were drawn. MD1: 1v4, 2v3; MD2: 4v2, 3v1; MD3: 1v2, 3v4. This would also be inline with the original draw of the groups as shown here. Therefore I rearranged the teams in the groups to be inline with what I've just stated.
  • The times for Group A, it would look much neater if it was stated that all times were UTC+6:30 rather than actually putting UTC+6:30 after every kickoff time.

So what do you mean "why"? Banana Fingers (talk) 18:47, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

George Washington Carver Sr. High

[edit]

If you are interested in creating a page specifically for George Washington Carver Middle, please create another page as I did this one. People put too much time into creating Wiki pages for folk to alter because they didnt take time as someone else did. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayebook (talkcontribs) 14:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unspaced en dash

[edit]

Hi, could you explain why you're going against] just about every major style guide in English, and the WP house style? Please read WP:MOSDASH. Tony (talk) 13:03, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there SPARTAN, VASCO from Portugal here,

please stop reverting me here. Let's go bit by bit:

1 - the word "season" goes inside the wikilink, not outside; 2 - i added one link for Copa del Rey and another for the Copa season (the case being 2007-08), it's supposed to be that way, not just one link OK?; 3 - the birthplace is to be relocated from intro to the body of article, not REMOVED summarily; 4 - box compression please, LAUSANNE only in box my man, fullname appears in storyline; 5 - in links, the name of site followed by "profile" in ALL cases makes for a much more coherent approach; 6 - some corrections seemed a bit strange, for example in PERSONDATA - the last stuff below, before the categories - i had written "Swiss footballer", you "corrected" it to "footballerr".

Attentively, happy week - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:50, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think it's better to have only LAUSANNE, but if you must, go ahead and change it to LAUSANNE-SPORT, i won't "hold a grudge" :) However, i have to tell you that your source for the Santander stats is wrong, the BDFUTBOL.com link is in the right (Spanish website, as the Racing de Santander ballclub), he played 23+7+6+0 in his four seasons (36, not 39 as you insert); if you see closely, you'll see that NFT.com also gives him 36. Another thing to wrap it up: in the introductions, let's keep it simple: "...is a footballer who plays for X club in Y country (if the player plays abroad)...", no need to write "club" or "team", it's implied.

Cheers (and by the way, is it me or is User:Banana Fingers a bit on the aggressive?) - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 23:46, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Abdelouahed Chakhsi has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Aaron Booth (talk) 21:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AFC Challenge Cup.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AFC Challenge Cup.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:43, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there SPARTAN, VASCO here,

If you want to participate in this discussion (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Incivility), as you are named there in one of the examples which are proof of his incredible incivility, please drop a line.

Attentively, have a good week - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 23:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Football match officials

[edit]

Hello. With regards to the English match officials listed on Football at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament I lean towards putting the British flag next to their names, perhaps with the English flag in parenthesis after their names as a compromise. I believe that when LOCOG provides accommodations for them during the Olympics they will be with the British delegation, and if they are allowed to march in the Opening Ceremony it will be behind the British flag.--MorrisIV (talk) 20:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


OFC Nations Cup 2012

[edit]

Will you please leave my work alone. I know what Im doing. Look at the Euro 2012 Squads. It is completly the same way I make the squads. So please. I dont edit your hard work?

Cheers

David-golota (talk) 23:57, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Saad Samir

[edit]

Hello Spartan008. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Saad Samir, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:58, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Match officials

[edit]

Why have you removed Allyson Flynn from the list? She is included in the PDF document file. Arbero (talk) 13:24, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see then. Thanks! Arbero (talk) 16:02, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Referee

[edit]

Yes, I accidentally added England, but please do not use this kind of language again. Arbero (talk) 13:44, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

George_Washington_Carver_Senior_High_School

[edit]

I see you made substantial edits to this article in the past. Perhaps you'd take a look at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:George_Washington_Carver_Senior_High_School - GroveGuy (talk) 04:29, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kevin Tapoko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laval (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Florian Gudit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C679 08:32, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nico Zwimpfer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kofi Nimeley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Maik Nakić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robin Vecchi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joël Kiassumbua has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Switzerland Squad 2005 UEFA European Under-17 Football Championship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. C679 05:23, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Switzerland Squad 2008 UEFA European Under-17 Football Championship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. C679 05:23, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Please read the MoS of overlink Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking#Overlinking and underlinking. It save you from expelling from wikipedia by avoiding unnecessary edit war. WP:Footy constantly updated their MoS, and as i creator of about 1,000 articles, i would say may early MoS back to 2007 on some footballers were ugly. and for the citation, every fact should be cited for biographical article, thus a index for match reports is some what importance as a "source", as I READ ALL THE MATCH REPORT AND ADD IT UP. (it because the stats isn't "created" but collected, which i found transfermarkt stats were more likely created than well sourced. transfermarkt itself, a COMMUNITY PROJECT, did not had a system to cite their stats and match report by newspaper nor football club website not broadcasting media, and i found they OFTEN wrong). Any unsourced material, could be challenged and removed. Certainly if without source, User:GiantSnowman would ask where the stats of Mattia Desole came from, and his usual answer is, removed them despite it may be true. Matthew_hk tc 21:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, for the cat, the MoS stated that there is no specific rule but generally least importance came LAST, especially year of birth and living people cat. Matthew_hk tc 21:41, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image-GoldLetterW.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Image-GoldLetterW.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AFC Challenge Cup 2006 - Bangladesh.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AFC Challenge Cup 2006 - Bangladesh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AFC Challenge Cup 2008 - India.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AFC Challenge Cup 2008 - India.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AFC Challenge Cup 2010 - Sri Lanka.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AFC Challenge Cup 2010 - Sri Lanka.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

[edit]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

[edit]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Spartan008. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]