User talk:Spartan-James/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello Spartan-James! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Evilclown93_(talk) 20:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hey!

Hey! I just wanted to let you know that if you need help with anything, you can feel free to leave a question on my talk page. Cheers! --Mschel 20:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

This edit by you was not the reversion of vandalism. It was the (re-)introduction of it. Semi-automated editing tools require careful use. Please use them more carefully than you are. Uncle G 18:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walt Disney World Monorail System

Regarding the content dispute over Walt Disney World Monorail System, please remember to assume good faith with other editors. Reverting another editor's revert and calling it "vandalism" [1] is generally considered to be bad form. While many of us are frustrated over this article's content dispute, declaring the edits of other established editors to be vandalism only escalates emotions. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Everyone starts out as a new person in the beginning. If you ever have any questions or issues, please do not hesitate to contact me. Hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia! --Kralizec! (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey its very ok. No harm done. You incorrectly warned me, and I gave you a warning to harsh. On wikipedia, you need to let things go, or you will get very upset and angry. If you have any questions about anything, please ask me, I'd be more than happy to help. --trey 17:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fallston High School and 12.173.107.73

Thanks for bringing back my revert of Fallston High School. I gave User:12.173.107.73 a final warning after that vandalism, and I'm watching to see if he vandalizes again. He seems to have a problem with Notable Alumni on High School pages. Jru Gordon 21:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, you haven't screwed anything up yet.--Jru Gordon 21:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Saw you in action just now, particularly when defending DerHexer's user page and then noticed (a) you've not been here long, but (b) you've got impressive anti-vandal contributions yet (c) you don't have anything shiny on your page - so please accept this.

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your rapid and determined efforts in combating vandalism - keep up the good work! Bencherlite 00:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Mighty Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For making extreme efforts in fighting vandalism.oysterguitarist~Talk 00:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been seeing you reverting lately and your new to this so i think you deserve this.

Thanks!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for defending my talk page! Get them crazy vandals! DangerousNerd talk 01:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Vandalism

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		For grasping the policies on vandalism and reverting so quickly, and being such an asset to all who call themselves vandal-fighters. Keep up the excellent work! Anonymous Dissident ^Talk -- (dated 07:47, 20 June 2007 UTC)

Main page

Hi there; I have absolutely no complaint, and am full of admiration. Quite seriously. I was right there; how did you find the main page vandalism before me? Do you know something I don't? --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 18:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. As I said, I was absolutely admiring, not ctiticising. Get another 2,000 edits and apply for RfA. I will support you.--Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 18:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is sometimes difficult, in this medium where one cannot express intonation, to avoid giving the impression of criticism. I meant none, nor did I mean to imply it. I was simply congratulating you for being faster to the punch than I was. And, as I said, looking forward to supporting your RfA as soon as you have enough edits on your record to satisfy the community.--Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 21:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Thank you very much for removing the vandalism on my user page. Your actions are greatly appreciated. Trusilver 03:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Peace. Spartan-James 04:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your report to WP:AIV

Thank you for making a report about 24.176.228.255 (talk · contribs · block log) at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. Goodnightmush^Talk 04:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks for all your helping fighting vandalism and keep up the good work! Goodnightmush^Talk 04:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for reverting the vandalism in my talk page. Keep up :) Teo64x 06:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Peace. Spartan-James 07:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sig testing

Spartan-James ^COMM _CONTRIBS

Please reduce your sig length slightly, it runs over lines. Thanks, GDonato (talk) 21:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Sig is Awesome!

I love your signature! The text has really cool lighting effect! d(-_-)b PNiddy-~ // ^{My edits} 03:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Turner

well i have an account but i forgot to sing in.... look at the edits done previously, they were NOT removed, but put in a different place. Check 'DVD tours' section on the page (now with images). Salmoria 22 June 2007 (UTC).thanks.

Broadband_Internet_access_in_Asia

Regarding the Broadband_Internet_access_in_Asia revert, that big block of text is the same as is located in the Internet in Japan article. If you think the text ought to be there twice, that's fine, you probably know WP guidelines better than me. Otherwise, re-revert. :) --62.203.32.6 09:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Call off the attack dogs

It wasn't vandalism. I'm Jinxmchue. 67.135.49.29 17:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are Jinxmchue, then please log in before making major changes to your userpage. Thank you. --Mschel 18:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle

Hi! How did you get your Twinkle edit summary to be the way you got it? If you take a look here you can see that I didn't get the same summary as you... — H92 (t · c · no) 22:57, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I always clear my cache, and I always purge the monobook.js-page too. ;aybe I'm a bit stupid, but how do I make it say "Reverted edits by XX identified as YY to last revision by ZZ", and not "Reverted edits to version XXXXXXXX by YY"? — H92 (t · c · no) 23:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got it, but the only thing I see is "[restore this version]" in brown. If you mean the buttons like "edit this page" and that when you say "at the top", the only thing I see is: warn, arv, csd, last, since, since mine, rpp, xfd. Is it possible for you to make a screenshot? Then I think/hope it would be easier... — H92 (t · c · no) 17:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yea

that editing i did, i just deleted a page of Gibberish. so next look at what i deleted before you warn me. -and to make it better you just put the page back up with the Gibberish. seriously look at stuff before you act.

Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		Wow. Extreme amount of anti-vandalism work. EXTREME. The normal anti-vandali barnstar wouldn't be enough. Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 03:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ReIntroduction of vandalism

I got a complaint from 68.82.9.116 that you gave him a warning message about blaning portions of pages when he actually he removed the vandalism and you brought it back as seen here [2]. I have taken care of it, but you may want to apologize to them Oyster Guitarst 17:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem we all make mistakes. By the way how can I get acces to the irc channel page I am considering using it. Oyster Guitarst 21:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Oyster Guitarst 22:49, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding that out for me, but i'm not sure if it will work on my computer cause it's from 1995 so i barley have memory left. But i'll be sure to do when I get a new computer. Keep up the good work :) Oyster Guitarst 18:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

Thanks for the revert on my talk page. Much appreciated! Keep up the great work :-) Regards. Will (aka Wimt) 23:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at Controversies over the film Sicko and comment on merge proposal

Hi,

The title says it all. I am requesting your opinion only because you've edited the Sicko (film) article and therefore appear to have an interest in the movie. I created the "Controversies" article and think it should stay, but I'd welcome your opinion whatever it is. If you consider this message annoying, I apologize. I'm leaving this message with you and some others without violating WP:CANVASS. I won't be leaving another message asking you to comment again. Noroton 23:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it was my intention

i have put that in the article but stupid bitches keep deleting it. Eric Sturm is on Kid Nation and he does win a Gold Star.--Sacksofffifth 18:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um....don't ever say peace to me again or you will be blocked. Are you even an admin?--Sacksofffifth 18:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning to 68.200.93.119

Hi, thank you for helping fight vandalism by reverting 68.200.93.119 to the US Declaration of Independence however, this was that IPs first edit a final warning might be violating WP:DBN. It might have been better to give a caution or a warning instead of final warning. Thank you again for helping fight vandalism ChrisLamb 22:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

68.111.71.125 warning

You recently warned User talk:68.111.71.125 at the same exact time as me. I took down mine, but I was wondering why you warned him when I reverted his edits? Deflagro 22:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, it's just that has happened to me before with someone else and I was wondering why. Good luck vandal-fighting! Deflagro 22:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:IRC

No, that sounds interesting though. Might have to check it out in a bit. Thanks! Deflagro 22:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

thanks for reverting vandalism from my talk page ♥Fighting for charming Love♥ 15:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another thanks

Wow, you do a lot of anti-vandalism stuff! Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my editor review. You rock :-) Charlie-talk to me-what I've done 12:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You are always there before me when reverting vandalism! H irohisat^{Talk Page} 19:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! :)

For your recent hardwork in reverting and warning users appropriately, I award you this RickK Anti-Vandalism barnstar. You earned it! :) Sebi _[talk] 08:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou

Thanks for reverting all the vandalism on my user page...it's nice to know there's people out there keeping an eye on things. Gwinva 13:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tina turner

hi, somebody blanked tina turner's page, i don't know how to fix it can you tell me? the begining of her biography is in the end of the article, i don't know how! Salmoria 2 july 2007

Thanks

Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page. I decided to indef block that user for extreme vandalism. Regards, Hús ö nd 00:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Question

Hi Spartan! I never really done this before, but how about modifying the script below. It's from a notice that a bot wrote to the creator of the page.

Notability of Asian Dawn

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Asian Dawn, by Kww (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Asian Dawn seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Asian Dawn, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Asian Dawn itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

H irohisat^{Talk Page} 02:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

I hit the wrong button. I didn't mean to blank the page. I actually reverted it myself before you got there. Thanks. 65.82.104.120 18:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I recieved the following message from you " Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Black supremacy, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Spartan-James 02:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC) The edit you are refering to in Black Supremacy was a vandalism correction. I corrected a statement that Yahweh ben Yahweh made his male followers watch films involving animals, not Tony Danza as stated on the vandelized page and the only other edit I've made was to the Fay School entry involving a nazi plot against the students in the early 21st century. So....what were the reverts and why? I am in no way questioning the reasoning. I'm just looking for something constructive.--CourtneySea 01:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reports to WP:AIV

Thanks for helping with vandalism, but I think you are clicking a few too many checkboxes on TW. For example, with your report here, you have vandalism directly after release of block, actions evidently indicate a vandalism only account, account is evidently a spambot or a compromized account. None of these items are correct. The IP was not previously blocked, nor can an IP really be an "vandalism only account" nor compromised, and there is not evidence of it being a spambot since it's not spamming. I did block the IP, but it would be helpful to admins if you only check the appropriate boxes. -- Gogo Dodo 03:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: No worries. Keep up the good work. =) -- Gogo Dodo 20:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me protect the article of "Buddhism by country"

Last some days,the user named Bikeable has been editing the article of Buddhism by country because he hate Buddhism (I knew him in a religious forum,he is a Vietnamese Christian extremist,he is oversea Vietnamese in USA)!Can you help me to protect it?Add it on your watchlist.That article is the result of mine (58.186.233.71),Chow Zhang Qui and yours with many people!

When I create new topic with the link of List of religious population.He was very angry when he knows his religion (Christianity) is under around 1.6-1.85 billion,not 2.1 billion as he thinked!!!And he was edited the religious percentage in Vietnam (10% Buddhists,15% Christians,v.v...)!

I'm copying the reply here that I left at User_talk:Vexorg: Please do keep an eye on it. I don't know where the venom above came from, but you'll see that I changed the estimate of Buddhists in China from a whopping 80%, unsupported by any sources, to 8%, the number cited on the Talk page, from the US State Department's Religious Freedom report. I gave detailed reasons on the Talk page. The whole page is extremely questionable, but using the figure of 80% gives an estimate of Buddhists literally a billion higher than any others. I plan to propose on the Talk page a reformatting, since the numbers are (as you recognize) for the most part unsourced. As for the stuff about my being an angry Vietnamese Christian extremist -- that's probably the weirdest thing that's ever been said about me, and I've no idea where it came from. Thanks for your attention. best, bikeable (talk) 03:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the blanking -- how weird. I think the page didn't load completely; my net connection was flaky yesterday and I recall that your talk page looked incomplete. My apologies. bikeable (talk) 16:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Why did you leave that message on my page? 72.208.79.73 23:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing me up

Thanks for reverting my user page. Since I got the admin flag a month ago, I've been hit with more userpage vandalism than usual. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies

I was trying to leave message and ended up accidentally blanking the page. I'm new at this, guess it was a beginner's mistake. 69.69.147.101 02:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, really? Was this the message that you were trying to leave, as an almost identical IP address to yours did five times on my talk page yesterday? Do it again and you'll be blocked again. Find something productive to do, why don't you.Tvoz |talk 03:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AGF

Not me, for this guy anyway. Thanks for the revert. Tvoz |talk 03:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Thank you for making a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. Anas ^talk? 22:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Good job fighting the vandals. Regards, Anas ^talk? 22:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage vandalism

Thank you sir for catching the vandalism to my userpage. Subject vandalised again after your final warning and has been reported to WP:AIV. Cheers! -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 22:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wounded in battle

From one vandal fighter to another, I award this Purple Barnstar to Spartan-James for being smacked around and having his user page edited by so many vandals that it has undoubtedly worn a hole in the harddrive sector containing his page. If they are shooting at you, it means you are doing something right. Trusilver 19:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for removing that drivel from my user talk. As it happens, the vandal is easily identifiable as User:Grandia01. (check the histories of the articles to which IP has contributed).Proabivouac 02:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for reverting vandalism on my page! Coastergeekperson 04 04:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

Its possible i have many people using this ip, could be one of them...they all hate lonelygirl anyway rofl... - 69.248.175.25 04:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you revert pages which have been vandalised so I can revert vandalised pages I come across? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.136.204.49 (talk • contribs)

Continuing vandalism by User:208.104.45.20 on American dialect pages

He is continuing to blank out a page on North Central American English and / or perform unproductive 3RRs on this page. He refuses to sign with 4 tildes. He is not explaining his destructive edits on Talk pages. He is using emoticons and entering article commentary on the article pages. (I noticed that you had also reprimanded him in late June about this kind of conduct.) And the administrators are'nt blocking him. What can be done about him?? Dogru144 00:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not too sure...just keep reverting and giving him warnings and suggest him/her/it for blocking by the admins. Peace. Spartan-James 01:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page

I came across your talk page on RC patrol and found that it is very large I was wondering if you could WP:Archive. Thank you. Oyster guitarist 01:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm...ok...but not right this second...but I'll get to it later today. Peace. Spartan-James 01:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]