User talk:SpartakusFreeMann

February 2014

Hello, I'm Ktr101. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to René Vilatte because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 22:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:56, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Yopie (talk) 11:30, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How ? I cannot reach an agreement, as everything I can do on the page (and please check, no destruction of content, no vandalism on my side !) if each time somebody reverts back to the previous version. I put my point in the talk page of the article. This article is a piece of crap. There is nothing I can do, as English is not my mother tongue. I leave this as for just what this page is about: pieces of lies and accusations back dating to the early 20th century. This article is just the point of view of ROMAN CATHOLICISM, so Wikipedia is Roman Catholic, not neutral. This is Wikipedia problem, not mine. And as a couple of contributors refuse to act and destroy what I am trying to do, I stop here.

This is not serious to accuse a contributor (me) to act as a vandal when just removing the story of a criminal who acted in early 20th century and where there is no proof of a direct link with the Vilate orders. Please check again my changes: nothing was destroyed or vandalized !

I have already stopped working for the French Wikipedia because of these issues, and I don't want to start new useless wikipedia's wars.

--Spartakus FreeMann 11:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)