User talk:Sparrowman980/facts

Qantas

I see that you have been making regular edits on some of the same articles as me.

I think we are fighting a losing battle re the number of aircraft in Qantas' fleet. Every time you or I update the number in the fleet, Russavia alters it back.

According to the Qantas FAQ, if you add up the total it comes to 220. I would have thought that this would be a reliable reference, but Russavia claims it is just PR and not substantiated.

I realize that this total includes all aircraft owned by subsidiaries including Jetstar, Qantas link, etc. I have even qualified this in several articles where this appears. In my opinion, this still makes Qantas the 17th largest airline in the world by fleet size, but Russavia has removed this as well from the Qantas article.

I suppose it would be possible to go through the CASA data for each of Qantas' subsidiaries and add them together, but I was just wondering if you knew of any other definitive references for the Qantas fleet and/or its position in world ranking or any other ideas about what we can do to ensure that this doesn't keep getting altered back each time someone updates it.

Regards,

Ozzieboy (talk) 13:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I guess it also irks me that someone who lives in Russia keeps downgrading the importance of the Aussie airline.

C'est moi.

^[1]Alors, je dois ceci etre.

DJC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.30.2.62 (talk) 06:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

^ Cite error: The named reference undefined was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[undefined-1] Cite error: The named reference undefined was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]