User talk:Spanneraol/Archive13

ignore the undo notice on Hyun-jin Ryu

Sorry, I was looking for this [[1]] and accidentally undid you. Meters (talk) 20:47, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Normal CornBelters roster

Template:Normal CornBelters roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pozzi.c (talk) 20:15, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:River City Rascals roster

Template:River City Rascals roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pozzi.c (talk) 21:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Reverted changes

There was no reason to revert my changes of the asterisk on the 2017 World Champion Astros.

Yes there was.. it does not belong there. Spanneraol (talk) 03:30, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pidgey Morgan

The article Pidgey Morgan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant print coverage of this player has survived. Fails WP:NBASE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

TY

I saw you were doing a lot of the work on the Crisis article (the CW version) and just wanted to say thanks. Thanks. — Ched (talk) 04:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

RFC at Batwoman

Just inviting you to participate in the RFC at Talk:Batwoman_(TV_series)#Request_for_comment about listing the monitor as a main character or a guest. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 01:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Current Pacific Association team rosters templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Current Pacific Association team rosters templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pecos League team rosters templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Pecos League team rosters templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:46, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ottawa Champions roster

Template:Ottawa Champions roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Arrowverse's Crisis on Infinite Earths

Hi. I saw your edits to Crisis on Infinite Earths and I'd like to let you know that the press release for Doom Patrol states that Robotman and Negative Man were performed through motion-capture. I just wanted to know what sources said that Riley Shanahan and Matthew Zuk did the in-suit performance for them. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Motion capture is for when you have a computer generated character.. these clearly are not CG.. they are stunt guys in costume. "Matthew Zuk has also been cast in the role of Negative Man, and he will provide the physical performance of the character on set in full body costume.[2] Spanneraol (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Darby o brien.png

The file File:Darby o brien.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Peter F. Galligan

Hi-I started an article about Peter F. Galligan who served in the Illinois General Assembly. He also played professional baseball and you started an article about Pete Galligan the same man. The two articles should be merged and I am not familiar with baseball to do this-my apologies for any problems-RFD (talk) 16:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AM570LASports.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AM570LASports.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Stephen Strasburg GAR notification

Stephen Strasburg, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.—Bagumba (talk) 06:15, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Redsox

Hey hope everything is going well I’m interested in talking to you about making an article may I have your email or phone number please, thank you. Boston4you (talk) 22:31, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: the editor above has been directly warned on their talk page not to make approaches to people in this manner. I advise you not to respond. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cincinnati Pippins players

A tag has been placed on Category:Cincinnati Pippins players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keon Barnum

The article Keon Barnum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBASEBALL—never played in a major league game per BaseballReference [3].

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

MLB PLayoff player pools

Why are you removing non-40-man players from player pools - some are still in pool and eligible. Teams are announcing them before every round. Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 19:27, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

The alternate site player pools have been shut down.. they are just carrying taxi squads which contain 40 man players. Spanneraol (talk) 19:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes, and that includes guys who aren't on the 40-man roster.... hence they're still available in the "pool" (or "taxi-squad") - there's a reason they're announced every round. Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 20:08, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Mookie Betts

He's pretty good, huh? – Muboshgu (talk) 03:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Yep.. definitely glad they picked him up. Spanneraol (talk) 03:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

The Red Sox tears taste especially delicious. The WS article is looking good. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

That was awesome. The last time the Dodgers won the World Series I was a Freshman in College watching on the small TV in the Dorm lobby.... i've been waiting so long for them to win again. Spanneraol (talk) 03:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

The only thing that tastes better than Red Sox tears is tacos..... --Jameboy (talk) 05:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Baseball Barnstar
		For significant contributions to the 2020 World Series article, including timely updates during and after each game of the series. Much appreciated! Dmoore5556 (talk) 05:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2020 World Series

On 28 October 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2020 World Series, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 06:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Peco League logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peco League logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the demerging

Please don't forget to add the WPBIO tag and any location-based projects too, like this. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Nick Longhi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Longhi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Longhi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dmoore5556 (talk) 06:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Cole Sturgeon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cole Sturgeon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cole Sturgeon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dmoore5556 (talk) 06:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Dallas Rangers

Category:Dallas-Fort Worth Rangers players has been nominated for merging to Category:Dallas Rangers players. Please see WP:CFDS.– Fayenatic London 22:57, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Smelly Bernardo

On the "Dominican Summer League Dodgers" page, you added a roster that includes "Smelly Bernardo" as one of the pitchers. Is this a real player and if so where can I find more information about him? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbon6201 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Looks like it was a typo, should be Smeily... but this is the player. [4] Spanneraol (talk) 02:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clayton McCullough, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burlington Indians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 in baseball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Criollos de Caguas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

years in baseball

Hey Sapnneroal, still super interested in this. I kind of lost a bit of momentum when COVID happened and displaced me from my regular job. Happy to revisit in after the completion of the 2020–21 Australian Baseball League season in a couple of weeks since you've spurred me on to complete it! JRA^Talk 00:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

TrueBlueLA

Hi, I have a question. I see that TrueBlueLA[5] is a source in dozens of article on Dodgers. Is it an RS? I saw an editor deleting material cited to it saying it is not an RS, and therefore deleting the material. And if it is not an RS, does that mean that all the other material in the other articles is subject to deletion also? Thanks. --2603:7000:2143:8500:C0AD:9D65:5166:A244 (talk) 07:13, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

It is part of SB Nation and it is a reliable source. Spanneraol (talk) 15:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Nice. Thanks. I left word on the talk page (Joc Pederson), pointing here. --2603:7000:2143:8500:C0AD:9D65:5166:A244 (talk) 18:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keenyn Walker

The article Keenyn Walker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBASE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tom Windle (baseball) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Windle (baseball), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Windle (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Chris O'Brien (baseball) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris O'Brien (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris O'Brien (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SportingFlyer T·C 21:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Trevor Bauer

I edited the page and mentioned that he has a court date, but will still play on Sunday. Has anything changed or are my sources not good?

This is an encyclopedia.. speculating about what might happen on Sunday is not encyclopedic.. we don't do updates like that.. If they pull him from his start that would be news. Spanneraol (talk) 19:53, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello. I was wondering why you reverted all of my recent edits about the all star roster. MLB announced that they were all replaced. Travisscottfan33253 (talk) 21:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

They were selected to the all-star game, so it still counts as a selection, even if they don't actually play in the game. Spanneraol (talk) 21:14, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Ah ok. I actually didn’t know that so thanks for letting me know. Travisscottfan33253 (talk) 21:16, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

How?

How do you add categories to your page? (Like putting: Wikipedia pending changes reviewer) Smuckers ^{It has to be good} 22:45, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Dodgers roster/roster navbox

Hi.

I know you're a big Dodgers fan and all and I understand that. I was just wondering if you would be willing to split the edits with me. I am a fan of the Dodgers as well. Maybe you can do the roster template full time and I could edit the roster navbox or something like that. I get Dodgers tweets on my phone so I will promise to edit whichever one I am in charge of in a timely manner. I hope we can come up with a fair compromise. Thanks. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 23:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

I don't think we need a formal agreement on that.. other people update it from time to time too.. I'm more focused on the season page since I have been working on those since the 2007 season (and went back and did most of the historical seasons as well).. I'm glad you started doing the stats stuff cause I always hated doing that part since it's such a hassle.. when I was updating those I would only do them once a week (on Sundays).. as to the rosters... I mean I get the tweets too.. I'm just not in front of my computer all day long to update stuff right away.. so I just do those if I see something while i'm at my computer... an exception was during the trade deadline when I was tracking all of that and trying to continually fix errors various IP editors were making at pages everywhere..and trying to make sure that everything is referenced. I also update all the minor league rosters that you don't seem particularly interested in. Spanneraol (talk) 17:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Dodgers Statistics

I hope you don’t mind this but since today’s game ended at 1:00am, I decided to postpone the update to about 8 hours from now. I promise that I will do it before the beginning of the game on 8/26. Thanks. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 10:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

No problem.. there is no deadline on doing that. Spanneraol (talk) 17:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

I’ll have the final regular season update done on Monday (10/4) at around 12-12:30. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 10:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

MLB game logs

Hi. Do you know if it is possible to make the formatting of all MLB game logs more similar to each other? It is very confusing to see differences such as omitted columns and text in collapsible sections. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 17:33, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

It's possible but not necessary.. different people have set it up separately and there is no requirement that they be entirely uniform. Spanneraol (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

There is none, but it could be more beneficial in the future. For some reason, there is one person who is updating almost all of the game logs. I do not know how that person can deal with different formats without much difficulty. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 06:20, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Newport Gulls players

A tag has been placed on Category:Newport Gulls players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- /Alex/₂₁ 10:05, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

New message from JalenFolf

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § Special:Contributions/2600:8801:A002:3700:0:0:0:0/64. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Dodgers statistics

Sorry for the delay on the Dodgers statistics. I will update them tonight with the last 3 games. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 21:55, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

2022 Los Angeles Dodgers

I know that this may be slightly premature considering the 2021 season is still going on and everything but I started a draft for the 2022 Los Angeles Dodgers season page mainly cause I wanted to enter the game log. Anyway, here is a link to the draft...User:GoWarriors151718/2022 Los Angeles Dodgers season. I look forward to working on this page with you. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 22:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

I usually don't create the new season page until the team's current season end. Spanneraol (talk) 13:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

2022 San Francisco Giants

When the time is right, may I create the season page for the 2022 San Francisco Giants please? Thanks. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 02:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Next year, could I have a chance to post the final roster for the Giants please? It is just that I am a big fan of theirs and I have been updating the roster for most of this season and all. Thanks. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 04:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Sorry.. you should have said something beforehand.. I have all the teams ready to go on my sandbox... I've been doing the end of season rosters for every team since I did all the past ones from 1876 to present.. When other people do them I usually have to correct them cause they either just put the guys who were on the roster at the end of the year or they forget to do multiple uniform numbers or something like that. Spanneraol (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks for explaining this to me. That's my mistake. Sorry for not asking earlier. If I do it, I promise that I will double and triple check my work. Keep up the great work. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 05:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Are you going to update the Giants roster template for the offseason? (activating all the inactive players and removing the pitching roles)? I saw you did the navbox but not the roster. Spanneraol (talk) 17:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Sorry I didn’t do it. Thanks for covering for me. I was busy for the past few days and I didn’t see the notification. Anyway, I was wondering if you think it is necessary to list all those statistical leads on the 2021 San Francisco Giants page? Some of them seem okay to leave but others seem a little too specific or unnecessary. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 09:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Seems a bit excessive to me. Spanneraol (talk) 13:09, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

The stats that I think are relevant to leave up on the top of the 2021 San Francisco Giants page are: homeruns, runs, walks, runs batted in, batting average, slugging, OPS, pinch hit homeruns, fewest homeruns allowed, fewest walks, and saves. Could you please tell me what you think please? I could use your help to make sure it is in the best shape possible. Thanks. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Tampa Bay Rays

The Tampa Bay Rays just lost the 2021 ALDS to the Boston Red Sox. So why do you think the Rays won (by reverting my edits)? Call me when you get the chance (talk) 04:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

They won the AL East division.. that's a regular series title.. not the division series. Spanneraol (talk) 04:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Of course the Rays won the AL East, but not the ALDS, but you still reverted my edits anyway. Why would you do that? Call me when you get the chance (talk) 04:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Because that line is for division titles, which THEY WON.. not for division series wins. Spanneraol (talk) 04:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Ah. Okay. Carry on. Call me when you get the chance (talk) 04:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Los Angeles Dodgers 2021-2022

If the Dodgers are eliminated tonight, may I help out with the Dodgers navbox and getting their roster template ready for spring training please? You can do the yearly roster for them if you want. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 22:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Well.. live to see another day. I thought you were a Giants fan? Spanneraol (talk) 03:37, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

I am a mixed fan. My mom was born and raised in the LA area and my dad was born and raised in the Bay Area. So I root for both of them. Anyway, I will work on them as soon as the game goes final (unless there is a massive comeback). GoWarriors151718 (talk) 03:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Odúbel Herrera

Hey there! First of all, I wanted to thank you for diligently fixing all the articles of everyone who became a free agent this offseason. I just wanted to let you know that I tweaked Odúbel Herrera's page, because, per this article and this one, unlike McCutchen, the Phillies actually still have control of Herrera's contract and he'll remain within the organization until December 2, at which point they can (and probably will, based on how he played this season) non-tender him and formally release him into free agency. Since this wasn't immediately obvious from the press release, I wanted to let you know so that you don't accidentally change it back. — GhostRiver 15:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Spanneraol (talk) 16:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matt Kent

The article Matt Kent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable baseball player, fails WP:GNG and WP:BASE/N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Wladimir Pinto

I'm a bit confused, why did you go to the effort of creating Wladimir Pinto then propose deletion a minute later? NemesisAT (talk) 12:38, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

It's not my own article.. I unmerged it from the minor league players page because he is no longer in that organization. Spanneraol (talk) 19:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Star Trek: The Original Series distributor

Unlike the other Star Trek series, Paramount Domestic Television doesn't appear to be the credited original distributor except maybe for the third season. The first two seasons Desilu Productions seems more likely. CBS Domestic Television (now known as CBS Media Ventures) is mentioned in the article as starting distribution in 2006. Paramount is mentioned as the original syndication distributor though. NBC, the original network is the closest to being the original distributor that can be identified. It definitely wasn't one of the future rights holders though. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Does that distributor box mean the original distributor or the current right holder / distributor? It is not clear... regardless.. NBC was never a distributor of the show.. they just held the original network rights. CBS Media Ventures is the successor company to both Paramount Domestic TV and Desilu. Spanneraol (talk) 23:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

From Template:Infobox television/doc "distributor The names of the original distribution company or companies." All of the info in the infobox is for the original release and names as credited then. Generally info after that point, if notable, is covered in the article but not mentioned in the infobox. We generally don't update names when ownership changes or names change and depend on redirects at the original names to point to or to a section of the successor named articles. If the original studio isn't a distribution company and sold directly to the network, the network is the distributor via broadcasting the series. IMDb lists NBC as a distributor for the series and it is the earliest listed. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nick Martinez

Hi, Spanneraol, I'm new to wikipedia. I thought I provided the source and I stated it was unconfirmed. If I'm not supposed to do that, let me know. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Equernimou231 (talk • contribs) 15:51, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

We don't include unconfirmed information in wikipedia articles. Spanneraol (talk) 16:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Aldrem Corredor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aldrem Corredor, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldrem Corredor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

STOP SPOILING NO WAY HOME

Peter Debruge ignored the warnings to not spoil the movie, yet he posted the spoiler-filled review BEFORE it released, not AFTER. Sure, the spoiler ends up confirmed, but that doesn't give you the right to spoil the fun for others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baxyofh4rd (talk • contribs) 05:23, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

We are an encyclopedia, we don't have deal with protecting spoilers here. Spanneraol (talk) 05:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Per WP:SPOILER: "It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot." So, if you hate spoilers, then GET OUT of the page for Spider-Man: No Way Home! LancedSoul (talk) 05:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

You alright?

Wanted to ask if you're in good spirits right now. With all the IPs and users who, despite reading WP:SPOILER, claim you're spoiling Spider-Man: No Way Home, I'm sure it can get pretty toxic. Hopefully, it'll pass once the film gets its general release. You doing okay right now? SuperWIKI (talk) 07:19, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Yea, I don't take this nonsense personally. Spanneraol (talk) 14:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

You keep undoing my edits

So, I noticed that you reverted my edit on the List of MCU Films page. Care to tell me why that is? FilmLover72

I reverted you once.. someone else did the previous time. As he said in his note, there has been no official announcement of a new film yet. Spanneraol (talk) 01:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Bill Barrett (utility player) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bill Barrett (utility player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Barrett (utility player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Therapyisgood (talk) 14:27, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of John Dwyer (baseball) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Dwyer (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Dwyer (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Therapyisgood (talk) 15:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Joe Fagin (baseball) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Fagin (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Fagin (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Therapyisgood (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cynthiana Cobblers players

A tag has been placed on Category:Cynthiana Cobblers players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Hello, I'm ToastGuard. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Taylor Russell, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -Toast (talk) 03:15, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

All I did was revert vandalism... the reliable sources were already in the article. Spanneraol (talk) 14:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Zech Zinicola for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zech Zinicola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zech Zinicola (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SportingFlyer T·C 22:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

TASM3

Maybe TASM3 could happen. Tom Holland said that he shows support for Andrew to make The Amazing Spider-Man 3.. Don't you know? Kevbo128 (talk) 01:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

We don't do speculation.. and online fan chatter is not notable. Spanneraol (talk) 01:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

You have to admit. Amazing Spider-Man 3 will happen soon. It'll be a matter of time, before Sony comes up with a decision. Kevbo128 (talk) 04:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

I don't have to admit anything... I think it's very unlikely that they would do that. Spanneraol (talk) 13:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Trade

Was the A’s-Braves trade announced by either side? GoWarriors151718 (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes.. The A's announced it. Spanneraol (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Eddy Alvarez page reversion inquiry

Hello, I recently noticed Eddy Alvarez was listed as a Cuban-American, which is technically correct, but I was curious why he is listed as such when other people born in the United States to immigrant parents are primarily listed as simply American and he is not. In fact, I myself have immigrant parents from Poland, to be more specific, which is why I’m very passionate about this subject, and yes, I was the person who stupidly edited the page under the pretense of fixing nationality, which in hindsight makes no sense and doesn’t apply in this context. I'm sorry to pester you about this. I simply want to understand the rules of Wikipedia, why my edit was undone by you, and why it's erroneous to call him solely American. After all, he has contributed quite a bit to our country in terms of sports. Midfieler (talk) 10:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Check'em all, before you revert.

If you're going to unlink bold team names in sports team season articles? Then you've got hundreds of articles to do, across many sports. NHL, MLB, NFL, CFL etc etc. GoodDay (talk) 22:51, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Most of the other MLB season articles do not have the link in the bold.. they were all removed at one point after a talk page discussion because there was some policy that it violated. MOS:BOLDLINK Spanneraol (talk) 22:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Recommend you bring your concerns to WP:SPORTS, as it's obvious that there's inconsistency across all sports season articles, including within the same sports themselves. GoodDay (talk) 23:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

PS- If what you claim is true? Then would you please complete the removals from all the MLB team season articles. Then begin with the NHL, NFL, CFL etc team season articles. I don't care how it's done, as long as there's consistency. GoodDay (talk) 23:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

I don't have the time to do such a thing, but there was a discussion on the baseball project page about this issue and the links were removed.. some may have added them back in but you shouldn't change it on your own without a consensus to do so. Spanneraol (talk) 23:37, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

But you do have time to revert me, of course. GoodDay (talk) 00:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Those are articles I am actively working to maintain... so I noticed them right away.. if you had started on the Cardinals articles I probably wouldn't have gotten involved. Spanneraol (talk) 03:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Sourcing your content

Seriously? You have been on Wikipedia more than long enough to know that new additions must be sourced. That's your responsibility as the person adding the new content. Please don't push off your lack of responsibility for your own actions onto me. Forcing me to search for a source for something you apparently already had access to is ridiculous. I did intend to search for it later, but got distracted. Nevertheless, the ultimate responsibility is yours, not mine. BilCat (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

And I was planning on coming back and adding a better source the following morning as it was late at night at the time... you didn't need to revert so quickly especially when it wasn't something that was a controversial addition. Spanneraol (talk) 22:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

As I said, I did intend to look for it myself later, but got distracted as I was about to do it, and forgot until I saw your edit summary. In the end, the source was added and that's the important thing to me. I've found that removing new unsourced items is a more effective method of ensuring that sources are added than adding a citation needed tag or doing nothing. Had you simply added the new information after the cited mention, I probably would have just tagged it. But you placed the new content in the middle of the old without changing the source, and that's a big bugaboo of mine, as it's misleading. It's far better to have outdated but cited information than to add new information in the middle of an older cited source. You don't have to agree with reasons, but I just wanted you to understand why I do it that way. I steps on toes sometimes, but sources usually get added the next time. BilCat (talk) 23:39, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

And it's Baseball. Everything has the potential to be controversial, even if it doesn't appear that way at first! :) Especially when dealing with records. (: BilCat (talk) 23:44, 2 May 2022 (UTC)