User talk:SpamFritterBitter
March 2024
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Luke Evans have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Luke Evans was changed by SpamFritterBitter (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889115 on 2024-03-28T17:21:30+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Greensleeves
[edit]I have started a new section at Talk:Greensleeves#Henry VIII yet again and you should respond there. You should comment on the facts and not make personal attacks (see Wikipedia:No personal attacks) as you did here. Appeal to ignorance is not the same as calling someone ignorant and is a phrase used to explain a fallacy. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I did not make any more of a personal attack than David Tokyo, who seems obsessed by the issue. Please do not make any such accusations again. SpamFritterBitter (talk) 09:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- My apologies if you thought that I was indulging in a personal attack. I wasn't calling you ignorant, I was saying that your approach was a clear example of an Appeal to ignorance. This is when someone argues that a conclusion must be correct because there is no evidence that says otherwise. In your case, you've taken it one stage further because while there clearly is evidence that Henry VII could not have written Greensleeves, you appear to be saying the evidence is not watertight - therefore it can't be used.
- Appeals to Ignorance are described as fallacies because they are not backed up with evidence, a foundation stone for any argument. If you have a credible source that does support your position, please post it in the new section Talk:Greensleeves#Henry VIII yet again where it will be reviewed. David T Tokyo (talk) 08:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)