User talk:Spacexmannn

Welcome!

Hello, Spacexmannn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Arjen Robben. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mattythewhite (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:52, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

@Mattythewhite:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Spacexmannn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not used Wikipedia in quite long. I remember having an account called "Keditz" which was indefinitely blocked. At the time, I was new to Wikipedia and didn't know that making multiple edits could lead to an indefinite block. Recently, I have only added updated/correct information on articles. I hope you can read the articles and see the improvements rather than believing that I've vandalised. I don't see me doing what is called sock puppetry, due to me now understanding Wikipedia more than I did when I got indefinitely blocked. Therefore, I think that there is no reason to not reverse the block.

Decline reason:

You need to log in to User:Keditz and make an unblock request from there. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:14, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Spacexmannn (talk) 16:26, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]