Jump to content

User talk:SpacemanSpiff/Archives/2017/October

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Satpokhariya

I didn't CSD Satpokhariya because "recently created" is rather vague but, as my summary here shows, it is useless. Can you check the original, please, to see if CSD might apply? If it doesn't, I'll have to send it to AfD again. - Sitush (talk) 07:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Prods shouldn't be applied after an AfD, but this is clearly G4 worthy, also a total of four socks. —SpacemanSpiff 08:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky

Can you file a report for Special:Contributions/X.Bosher-Smith.X and IP Special:Contributions/82.132.229.15? 123.136.111.139 (talk) 11:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

I have no idea about that sockfarm, you're better off contacting Ponyo or Sro23. —SpacemanSpiff 12:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Got it.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

GSB

Doubtless another sock but is it Madgaonkar or Panjikar? I am tempted to revert their comments per DENY but it doesn't really fit. Can it be done per SOCK? - Sitush (talk) 17:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

All sorted. Blocked by Ponyo, unblock refused by Boing! said Zebedee. To mangle a common UK saying, it would seem that admins are like buses :) They do not seem to have filed a UTRS unblock thus far, which suggests either that it is Panjikar or that Madgaonkar has given up on UTRS. - Sitush (talk) 20:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
We're big and red? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Well, if you want to get personal, I'd say perhaps "not svelte" and lavender/cream. We're not in London, thankfully. I must add, though, that the bus service round your way seems to be excellent. I've used it on a few occasions, especially for trips to museums. In my part of the world, the notion of buses = "none for ages then three at once" definitely applies. - Sitush (talk) 23:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For religiously following WP:ARBIP and preventing addition of inflammatory and contentious statements in Indian castes like Brahmanas, Kshatriyas, Shudras and many including varnas and other social groups. Your hardwork deserves applause. Thankyou for doing so many things for the country where I come from. Regards, Anoptimistix (talk) 08:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
+1, although it is not my country. - Sitush (talk) 23:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Amika Shail (singer)

Hello, a troublesome IP is removing G4 continuously from this article. Please check previous deletion discussion here. The article has been repeatedly created after deletion. Please look into this and take proper action. Thanks Hitro talk 21:59, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Creator blocked as an ad only account. It's likely part of a paid COI farm, but I can't figure out the group. —SpacemanSpiff 23:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Sock

User:Asm sultan seems to be a sock of Rattans. --regentspark (comment) 14:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

IMO, it's unlikely to be Lord Aseem both in terms of style and topics covered. And while both Asm sultan and Rattans edit heavily from their mobiles, they seem to have little else in common. Rattans also used edit from a different device earlier. Asm sultan, however, edits largely in the Bengal/Bangladesh space and he is probably a Bazaan sock. His first edit was on 11 August, four days after you reported Farabi1994 as a Bazaan sock and blocked him. Yesterday, I reverted an edit by Asm sultan where he added a map created by Vaza12, a prolific Bazaan avatar. (The image has since been deleted.)—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 10:53, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
I think capt haddock is correct. I was looking at this edit which is identical to Rattans' edit on the Mughal Empire page. But the rest of their activity is quite different. Bazaan sock likely but I'll let you decide that one. --regentspark (comment) 00:56, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Article creation tban?

While I hate to do this to an editor acting in good faith, I'm concerned about the creations of this user, which have been a sink for editor time and effort, more than anything else. I've tried to warn them, but I'm uncertain the message is getting through. I'm involved here, and have temporarily handed in the tools in any case: would you take a look? It isn't urgent, but needs dealing with. A lot of the warnings have been deleted, fyi, as have their creations. I suspect a final warning, at the very least, is required. Cheers, Vanamonde (talk) 06:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

It is unfortunately needed now, it's not any different from Junosoon who I tbanned from Indian economy articles and he promptly went over to create bad articles elsewhere. In this case, the problems are all around the health care system and not necessarily India related, so I think an ARBIPA tban on article creations may cause this issue to move elsewhere, but it's probably worth a try, I think. RegentsPark, what do you think?—SpacemanSpiff 08:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
THis is perhaps something for the MEDRS folks to look at, just see Vamana (Panchakarma). Let's see if @Doc James and Smartse: or some of the other medical topic editors have anything to say about this, the generic bios and organization articles around the India aspect are definitely problematic and merit a topic ban at this point. —SpacemanSpiff 08:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
signing again for the ping to go through. —SpacemanSpiff 08:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
The big thing is we need to see WP:MEDRS followed. I have trimmed the primary sources. It is something that exists so should be covered but we should not be making medical / health claims without proper medical sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment--I have been keeping a watch on his creations and editing activities.My and DGG's spate of activity over the recent days meant that currently 75% of his articles have been deleted or redirected and several more are lying at AfD.And some will probably land at AfD soon! If he chooses to indulge in any single disruptive creation of article(s) without any inclination to adhere to our policies, I will be proposing for an article-creation-ban at AN.Basically, he shares the same problems as Junosoon but erratic activities over a long span only meant that he was discovered quite late.But despite all these, he seems to be a genuine good-faith editor, terrifically interested in WP, attending WikiData conferences and all that....Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 10:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
  • I think the 75% may be deceptive, I saw an article marked as deleted on that but existing in reality because he creates them again after it gets deleted, right now he's sandboxing something deleted at AfD. Also, while I don't doubt the intentions here, the wikidata involvement i something I generally worry about. One of our biggest promo sockmasters Aboobackeramani (or something like that) is very active there and has figured how to manipulate stuff over there to affect articles on different projects. —SpacemanSpiff 12:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Dear All, Greetings! I am taking things happening to articles created by (I am aware that there is no concept of ownership at WP) me very seriously. It has caused and is causing a lot of stress to me. It is always difficult to face when one's actions are being scrutinized. I have decided that I will relearn things at Wikipedia and will take this as a learning opportunity. I am very happy that Godric on Leave considers my edits as good faith. I am happy that my intention is not doubted. I would like to assure Doc James that I have no intention to add anything on Wikipedia which has no proper references and which is not tested. I am myself against non tested medicine and I am aware the amount of risk it poses to put information about non tested drugs on Wikipedia. I had written a blog about the same over here way back in January 2016. The reason I got interested in WP in 2011 is because I found it logical. Now it seems that many developments have happened and I missed to catch up those developments. Hence as suggested by AshLin to me, I will relearn things at WP. It will take some time. I am of the opinion that WP should not suffer because of my lack of understanding of it. I must mention that I am in great pain because of articles getting deleted created by me, but it is a learning opportunity. I am keeping good faith that none of you have anything against me and you are only trying to help in different ways to make articles better. I am very much thankful to all of you including DGG for the same. It is a mixed feeling I would say. From one side I am feeling good because of the attention I am getting but I am aware that this is not a nice way to get attention when my mistakes are being pointed out. I have became more and more aware of how important one's edits are for WP and how carefully one should edit as a result. AshLin had advised me in the beginning itself that I must edit very carefully on WP. It seems that it is time again for me to pay attention to his advise and work accordingly. I believe in constructive criticism and all the constructive criticism is welcome when there is no personal hate involved. In future, if I find some things difficult to understand, I will take your guidance there. I am in fact happy that you considered me worth to discuss about. Being a doctor, I am absolutely aware of my duties towards well-being of the patient and as I have learned from Dr. Abhay Bang, that my personal ego should not interfere with his care. Care of patient is the supreme thing above all. In my opinion, as I have learned from Dr. Abhay Bang, they are my gods and I consider that I am serving them through Wikipedia. He had said once that giving knowledge to a confused person is like giving medicine to a patient or giving food to hungry person. Hence work of Doc James is of doctor of doctors. It is not an easy job I know and I will make sure that I will try to do my bit as far as possible with proper guidance. I welcome all kind of constructive criticism and I am ready to share my position on any of the topic. I am also ready to change my position if needed. Thank you. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 05:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Lord Aseem

[1] within hours of his block expiring. I have repeatedly tried to explain to him how sourcing works on Wikipedia, but he does not seem interested in understanding. Khirurg (talk) 19:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

I would have to say I am disappointed in Lord Aseem's action(s). Even after I posted on their talk page asking them to self-revert and gain consensus, my request was ignored. Not sure what else can be done. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
@Khirurg and Kansas Bear:, it appears that this is going on across multiple articles (I see a lot of posts on the talk page from Utcursch, and in this particular one it's just one revert since coming back, while problematic, he seems to have stopped so I'll refrain from blocking for that. However, in such cases it is appropriate to give the user a {{alert}} for WP:ARBIPA-- {{subst:alert|ipa}} as these topics are definitely covered under that. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 23:39, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. IMO, he's been given enough rope to improve his behaviour. Edit-warring is one thing, but the personal attacks and general incivility needs to be addressed. Note that he's been give stern warnings for calling other editors quacks and retards, Indophobic bastards, etc. (and revelling in repeatedly referring to these insults). These were prior to his block for edit-warring. Soon after his block expired, he says this: Ultra-bigotted Leftist narratives are being peddled here by Rashkeqamar. His bias is obvious when one percepts his name is a Urdu figure of speech. And the "Indophobic", "anti-Hindu" bilge continues unabated.—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 08:11, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
@Cpt.a.haddock: I did not see those diffs (they weren't noted at the AN3 reports that I looked at) when I blocked earlier. I've now blocked for the Padmavati diatribe, but it'd be helpful if whenever something like this comes up WP:ARBIPA {{alert}}s are given to the editors, Kautilya3 does that proactively and I think that makes handling these situations far easier. Please do that going forward. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 11:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Will do. Thanks.—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 12:38, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Yes, indeed. The ARBIPA sanctions box is scary enough that most editors back off after you give it. It is a wonderful preemptive medication! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:07, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
This is very likely the same chap who appears to have now become a fan of the word tendentious.—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 16:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Could be, but I don't see a duck block reason though, unless I'm missing something. —SpacemanSpiff 04:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Same ISP (Hathway) as the IPs listed here. No harmful edits as of yet. But the edit summaries are a bit of a giveaway as is the topic overlap.—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 07:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
The .242 IP above is active once again. Compare his Kingdom of Khotan POV-pushing at Indo-Scythians and Sakaldwipiya with his older IP here. Thanks.—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 12:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Hallo

Sock of Motivação

It seems India like Brazil are living the future.2017 has to be closed.Kingofwoods (talk) 17:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

You didn't answer to my sentence.USA.UK and all main countries have 2016 estimates.Why India and Brazil not?Kingofwoods (talk) 17:18, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

You don't answer becaus eyou know to be wrong.Kingofwoods (talk) 17:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

मध्य प्रदेश

This fellow filed an SPI against himself, and is apparently also active on Commons and the Hindi Wikipedia. This appears to be Virajmishra, based on this; here, they apparently confess to socking. Just wanted to run this by you before blocking them and requesting a global lock. Thanks, GABgab 17:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Just kidding, it is really them. Blocked and paperwork done. GABgab 17:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
@GeneralizationsAreBad:, that chap's such a nuisance, I only handle him at en and commons, I don't really do anything at all at hi. You're likely next in line for his attempted logins and password resets, he's already tried that with Yamla, JamesBWatson and me. I've asked for deletions and block at Commons and a lock at meta. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 00:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Ranvir Sena

Hi, sorry I didn't revert the vandalism earlier on said page. I didn't know it was. I guess it was illogical of me to assume it's not given that it's a far-right organisation and it is said to be Maoist. Thanks for reverting it to the right revision BTW. :P The Ninja5 Empire (Talk) 03:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

No worries, I just have the article on my watchlist so I know what the nuisance edits are. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 03:35, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Semi at Bhar and Rajbhar

Hi, you semi'd Bhaarshiva recently but the problem has now moved to Bhar and Rajbhar. - Sitush (talk) 10:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 12:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

trouble

what can i do if someone abusing their power over community? the user has been backed by Admin or any of his friends which halting any information if the info's aren't favoring on their exclutionist ideas? which even its well sourced based on references of free content, they also blocking anyone which accused socks if they agure over the infos which should be published or not they just wiki as they flatform Lydonbaines the banned troll has been working in wikipedia using IPs with his /her minions and Registered members mostly from indonesia what should i we do on them the complaints on conflict of interest has been halted by an admin which is their friends  ? (Pricedelink (talk) 11:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC))

No idea what you’re asking about, and I can’t investigate now but if there is a behavioral problem with an editor, then you should check at WP:ANI, providing the requisite details with diffs (unlike here).--—SpacemanSpiff 11:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Thought you might want to see this

I was patrolling on Huggle and saw this: [[2]]. Mentions you. I already reported him to ARV. Adotchar| reply here 01:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Lord Aseem block evasion (again)

Hey :) FYI, 2606:a000:4382:300:8950:7f21:b55c:519c (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 2401:4900:1981:40e8:b5dd:7a01:a17:8750 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), and 2405:204:96:a9b2:a253:c65b:321b:5e2d (talk · contribs · WHOIS) are likely socks of Lord Aseem. Some of these were actually active when he was appealing his block :/—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 17:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

One of those IPs may not be a sock, just meat; but the other two are obvious. Block extended now. —SpacemanSpiff 00:12, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

GAkash

GAkash (talk · contribs) is inserting big chunks of text into various articles. Unsourced, mostly trivial, probably copy/pasted. I've issued an alert re: sanctions. - Sitush (talk) 13:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I suspect they will come back under another name! Do you have a flashing blue light permanently strapped to your head? - Sitush (talk) 13:29, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Let me know if there are any mroe revdels to be done. I just picked up the flu during my travel, so I'm trapped on the couch with my computer (when I'm not napping), so I'll probably be more active than usual for the next few hours, that's all. —SpacemanSpiff 13:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Panchal was a definite copy/paste, as noted in my edit summary. You've semi'd Jangid but the pending changes box is still showing. - Sitush (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Mind, if you've got flu you won't be fit to do anything here soon. Best to take care of yourself and leave the clean up to others, I think. - Sitush (talk) 13:47, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

OCTA Innovation

Hi, I am wondering if you could return this page or send me the page content, so I can fix the parts which caused the article deletion. I now that I should contact the user who deleted it, but User:Fuhghettaboutit is not active for over a week. I hope you could help me, thanks. --Semso98 (talk) 10:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

I will not do it as it's a copyvio. You know you've copied content from http://octa-innovation.eu, so why do you want this sent back to you? —SpacemanSpiff 12:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
It was not entirely copied, just one part which I have mostly deleted, but there is still one more paragraph that has to be deleted. I hope you can allow me to get the content, so I can edit and write the article which will completely obey Wikipedia rules. I have made the mistake with publishing the previous version and it will never happen again. --Semso98 (talk) 13:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I will not do that, I do not restore content that is either copyvio or advertorial and this is a combination of both, and the little I checked for copyvio came back as text from that website. You can try asking at WP:REFUND to see if another admin might do that for you, but make sure that you note that I declined for this reason, when you ask there. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 14:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

3R violator

Sorry to disturb you, but can you please have a look at edit history of Dhinchak Pooja and Contributions of 34syd4t4. Thanks -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:32, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Both of you were at 3R, but the bigger problem is that the article was copy-paste moved after the duplicate was redirected to the original. I've fixed that now and protected it, any title change can be discussed using WP:RM and the histories fixed after that. —SpacemanSpiff 10:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 13:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Again. Please have a look. Thanks -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 14:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
There are some thigns on which verifiable youtube videos are acceptable, this is an interview of her, but I can't say if it's doctored or not, best for you to post at WP:BLPN and get fresh eyes to look at it. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 14:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

RaagDesh17

Inactive since May but should RaagDesh17 (talk · contribs) be blocked for promo? - Sitush (talk) 16:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

There's at least one earlier account too. —SpacemanSpiff 16:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, SpacemanSpiff. You have new messages at Dagduba lokhande's talk page.
Message added 06:18, 27 October 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:18, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Why was Gauthamadas Udipi page deleted

Why was Gauthamadas Udipi page deleted within 24 hours of warning without giving any attempt for correction? We understand that there may have been some hyperbole in wording but all the matter was authentic and referenced. No chance was given for correction. Please return the page so that we can correct it Sakthisri (talk) 08:43, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

sockpuppetry

Hello SpacemanSpiff, One of the most notorious, infamous and belligerent socks here on wiki (vrghs jacob) is using many many accounts as we speak. I'm listing only some of accounts as currently I'm a bit busy, also I don't want you to get overburdened. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SshibumXZ, Japanmomo, Ayush12raj2003, Rohannarain, Bharat.varsh, etc. Also, please have a look at how he is vandalising Civil Services of India's article by adding defunct services to the list. This is the current list of services as per DoPT as of 3rd April 2017. http://document.ccis.nic.in/WriteReadData/CircularPortal/D2/D02adm/OMUpdationoflistdated03.04.2017.pdf 

 he's the same person who vandalised it earler. Also, please restore the article to the revision kept by the admin (bishonen) on 21 may 2017. Please increase the protection level to admin only and also the duration of protection. I shall keep reporting you his other accounts. <redacted>. And I'm the one who got his most accounts blocked.

thanks!

bharat varsh is his own account. he talks with himself using muliple accounts having opposing views to make it look like different persons, and different edits also he changes his IPs while doing so. he's kind of mentally sick if you ask me. please resore the civil services article, protection admin only and its duration. thanjs!

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SpacemanSpiff/Archives/2017/October&oldid=1141394461"