User talk:SpacemanSpiff/Archives/2017/December

Shirley Setia

Sir, I edited Shirley Setia page but you removed my addition. Can I know the reason ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imran231 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

This is another one of your inappropriate links, it's a "Coming Soon" website with no verification. —SpacemanSpiff 12:49, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Shirley Setia

Here is the link where you can get verification about that link and verified by Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/pg/shirleysetia/about/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imran231 (talk • contribs) 13:25, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SpacemanSpiff. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Mail

Hello, SpacemanSpiff/Archives/2017. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Prabhanjanmutalik (talk) 11:31, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

• @Prabhanjanmutalik: please take this to WP:SPI, I think htere are confirmed socks under Pv.abhinav and given the number of socks he creates, that is necessary as I can't block them all based on just behavior. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 08:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
• @SpacemanSpiff: Alright. Thank you! Prabhanjanmutalik (talk) 08:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Muthuraja page

This like already there for Ilogomutharaiyar page union person remove the link.I i undo this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.210.41.126 (talk) 11:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Emptying the sea with a spoon

Checking out the massive additions by an IP of actors etc to the List of Brahmins page, I discovered not only that the sample I looked at are all unsourced, and their Wikipedia pages say nothing about being Brahmins, but also that, per their own pages, pretty much all Nepali actors are the best and most famous actor in the world. I removed a few peacock claims, but it's like emptying the sea with a spoon. Say woof to your edit notice dog from me! Bishonen | talk 12:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC).

I've semi protected under GS/Caste, all such lists need semi now I think, I had to do it for another couple lists over the past few days, the Brahmin list in particular is the work of socks, just that there's too many of them to keep track and block. But this is more like emptying with a fork, given our policies! —SpacemanSpiff 12:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I've long had the feeling that administrators should have the option to indef-semi or indef-EC-protect any page related to caste, religious nationalism, or the India-Pakistan conflict, at the slightest sign of trouble. The amount of nonsense (socking, POV-pushing, unsourced content, puffery, copyvio) that goes on is incredible, and we do not have the tools to stop most of it. How do we make this happen? Vanamonde (talk) 13:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

You do have the option to do that for caste pages per WP:GS/Caste and ECP for caste pages per the AE discussion on that (Bish might have the link to that discussion, but you should be able to find it in the AE archives from a couple of years back). Doesn't cover religion though. Unfortunately, I still can't get myself to do the indefs, the longest I do is for a year. —SpacemanSpiff 13:45, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

I'd forgotten about that: thanks for the link. It's been a while since I've dealt with caste stuff. I'm actually thinking about making a serious effort to get similar measures authorized for religious conflict/religious nationalism stuff. I'm not sure how to go about it just yet, but I'm sure you agree it's necessary...Vanamonde (talk) 14:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Dr.Vir

Dr.Vir (talk · contribs) is back making edits such as this. Despite previous notes and sanctions alerts, they do not seem to be grasping WP:V. - Sitush (talk) 20:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

• RP has given a final warning now and no edits since then, I'll block if I see any behavior repeated. —SpacemanSpiff 04:15, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

NLT

See here. They've already been warned about WP:NLT but seem to want to insert an extended citation request for something in the lead that is dealt with in the body. - Sitush (talk) 10:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for blocking but they're now socking. - Sitush (talk) 15:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Blocked and protected. --regentspark (comment) 15:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

ANI

Since you were the closer of the ANI thread and imposed editing restrictions, please note Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#StuRat_toying_with_their_editing_restrictions. - Sitush (talk) 23:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

The section has been renamed (twice). See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#StuRat's editing restrictions. - Sitush (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Mahfuzuser

Mahfuzuser (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

You had warned @Mahfuzuser, but their persistent disruption continues. The Shani and Navagraha articles may need a watch. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

	Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
	Wish you a Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year 2018! – GSS (talk|c|em) 18:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

social issue

sir, i am rawana rajput, here on wikipedia a page is edited by you named "ravana rajputs". either you don't know about rawna rajput or you are intensionally scandalise our community. we are in census aprox 50 lakh in india, it means you are abusing a large number of people on Internet. if it is not intensionally , then i request you to change the article. please dont misinterpret. reach me as soon as possible and help us. Rawanawiki (talk) 14:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

A candidate for a tban

(or a NOTHERE block), possibly: [1]. I've given them an ARBIPA notice, and they've continued to behave poorly. See this, for instance. Vanamonde (talk) 08:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

History of rawana rajput

The main responsibility of the Kshatriya character of the ancient Aryan culture was to protect and rule.It was the duty of the Kshatriyans to maintain the existence of the state by fighting the enemies in terms of security and to protect the people and to serve the people in terms of governance. These people of Kshatriya Charitas were divided into countless castes. Rajput caste is one of them.

In the ancient times, the king had many sons, and the kingdom was not divided among the Rajputs. Therefore, the eldest son of the king(Raja) was the successor of the kingdom and was called the King. His remaining sons were called princes (Rajputra) because of the son of the king. In time, the word rajputra became a reader or caste and was called Rajput. After the father's death, the elder brother became the king and the remaining younger brother started working in different positions in the service of the king The king also kept his trusted and faithful people in important and responsible positions, and who could be more trusted and loyal than his younger brothers? Therefore, the best and important positions of the state such as recovery of revenue, leadership of the army, suppressing the state's rebellion, the king's trusted bodyguard, the custody of the ninja etc. etc were used by his younger brothers. "Thus, the eldest son of the king became a Rajput after being a successor and his younger brother Raval was called. It was a title of 'Raaval' and the form of 'Raval' got spoiled and became 'Ravla' and this was the reflection of 'Ravana'.

Ancient Arya people~>Kshatriya + brhamn + kshudra + vesya

Kshatriya~> Rajput and Rawana Rajput So we are Rawana Rajput

Ravana Rajput is a society of glorious Kshatriya class, which keeps its separate existence due to country-love, renunciation, bravery, dignity, affection and country service. This class of Rajputs has its own glorious past and history. Rawanawiki (talk) 08:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)