User talk:SpacemanSpiff/Archives/2013/January
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:SpacemanSpiff. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 31 December 2012
- From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum
- In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser a success; Czech parliament releases photographs to chapter
- Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes
- Discussion report: Image policy and guidelines; resysopping policy
- Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review
- WikiProject report: New Year, New York
- Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined
Hamster Huey and the Gooey Kablooie
Spiff: there may be a some Calvinball problems going on here.--Shirt58 (talk) 11:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
- News and notes: 2012—the big year
- Featured content: Featured content in review
- Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
Hi, how have you been? Looking at the above user's contributions doesn't it look like padmal. —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
There is an issue regarding the inclusion of Nargis Dutt's image in the list. Would you mind having your say? —Vensatry (Ping me) 15:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
- Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
- News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme
- WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
- Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality
- Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
- Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
- Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months
- Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment
Hi, SpacemanSpiff ! How r u ? I would like U to move the page Chhatrapati (film) to Chatrapati (film) (which inturn redirects to Chhatrapati (film)), to its correct spelling, which is also widely used - known one. The film was certified as Chatrapati in its Central Board Film Certificate. regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 21:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC). Place a TB
The Signpost: 21 January 2013
- News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward
- WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics
- Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review
- Arbitration report: Doncram case continues
- Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success
Chola Dynasty FAR
Hi SpacemanSpiff - The FAR for Chola Dynasty (located at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Chola dynasty/archive1) has been sitting around for quite a while. One editor did some work on the article a couple of weeks ago, but as someone who doesn't work much with Indian articles, I don't have the background to tell whether the sourcing and neutrality concerns have been addressed. Would you (and/or your wonderful TPS) have a few minutes to check through the article, and hopefully post any thoughts you may have to the review page? Thanks in advance, Dana boomer (talk) 23:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 January 2013
- In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention
- Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics
- WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess
- Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests
- News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate
- Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012
- Arbitration report: Doncram continues
- Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems