User talk:Spaceman42

"scary story" about White Rock Lake

Before you add back that "scary story" about White Rock lake, you need to document it. The story you added is a common form of folklore that is not unique to WRL. Nova SS 20:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jaws

Hi there! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not re-add false or inappropriate information to an article as you did to Sci fi channel. The consensus is that Jaws is a horror movie. Attempting to re-add such information without discussing it first is tantamount to vandalism, and could get you blocked from editing. --Janus Shadowsong | contribs 17:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Sci Fi Channel (United States). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. . Specifically in regards to "Jaws" and "Poseidon Adventure" which consensus has deemed a Horror movie. -- KelleyCook 17:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3rr warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. -- KelleyCook 17:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Sci Fi Channel (United States), you will be blocked from editing. Lra drama 08:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TRUE INFO

Hello, thanks for putting across your issues to me.

Can I first tell you that I am MALE and not female, thankyou ;-).

Yes, when putting 'true' info into an article, I think it best to discuss it in the talkpage for that article first, and providing proff (i.e. a link to another site first). Then, everyone will know that you're telling the truth, and it won't get deleted. Thanks, and that's Mr. Lra drama 11:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to AnimeFest, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Farix (Talk) 22:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Sagging (fashion). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Last Voyage Of The Starship Enterprise

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Last Voyage Of The Starship Enterprise, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not notable without substantial coverage in reliable independent sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 19:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Richardson High School. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Captain_Kangaroo

You made substantial changes to the article which your edit summary described as "corrected typo error." As this description does not explain the massive changes, another editor has reverted the edit. Please be sure your edits cite reliable sources. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sagging (fashion) again

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Sagging (fashion). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SummerPhD (talk) 23:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 01:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The debate was closed. The result was Keep. Thank you, Spaceman42, for creating this new article on Wikipedia. — Cirt (talk) 01:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Puffy AmiYumi 2017 Tour Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Puffy AmiYumi 2017 Tour Poster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 05:45, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Spaceman42. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]