User talk:Spaceflo.L8

February 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Vienna because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vienna. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Vienna was changed by Spaceflo.L8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858167 on 2015-02-14T20:14:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Vienna with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:44, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Materialscientist and Wtmitchell, I understand that a lot of vandalism is going on here on wikipedia, and it's sometimes hard to distinguish between relevant contributions and vandalism. I suggest that you check my contributions and improvements with the official sources provided (in my case: official weather reports) instead of removing them. You'll find out that they are correct. Good luck! Spaceflo.L8 (talk) 14:15, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello. I suppose a belated welcome is in order, after the misunderstanding above. Please understand that meteorological data are quite a popular target of subtle vandalism, so Wtmitchell and Materialscientist rushed a bit. Thank you for the detailed meteorological statistics and the table in Sunshine duration; I see you're quite well versed with the wikicode so no lessons are required. I hope you'll stay with us. No such user (talk) 14:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Worldwide Data

Hi Spaceflo.L8. Great job on the sunshine duration! I was searching for world-wide sunshine duration, and was wondering how you would go about extending the table for other cities outside Europe, say New York. I would be happy to contribute. --Pascal Steger (talk) 12:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]