User talk:SoyokoAnis/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:SoyokoAnis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

thank you for semi-protecting the Solomon Souza page

I am grateful for your intervention. As a writer who uses Wikipedia often, I have been shocked and confused by the constant use of this particular page to post slanderous, nonsensical, and also vicious diatribe about a young artist and his family. This, to my mind, is not what Wiki is supposed to be, which is why I have finally taken the unusual step of signing in myself to see what can be done. Once again, my gratitude.VMinGoa (talk) 08:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome! Thank you for your kind message. SoyokoAnis - talk 12:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Julian Radcliffe - removed untrue and discrediting sentences which cast aspersions on the good character of Mr. Radcliffe and his work

Dear Soyoko

How do I make my edits on Julian Radcliffe's bio stick? I typed up an explanation, see the text I typed in subject heading pasted above. I suspect a disgruntled partner of Julian Radcliffe is attempting to cast aspersions on his work and good character and I am on a mission to removed these defamatory sentences. How can I do this?

best wishes WitleyMary — Preceding unsigned comment added by Witleymary (talk • contribs) 12:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Please use reliable sources, to learn more. SoyokoAnis - talk 13:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Julian Radcliffe bio entry

Dear Soyoko

I am trying to correct inaccurate statements in Julian Radcliffe's entry. He most certainly co-founded Control Risks in 1975 as an example. We strongly suspect someone with intent to defame Julian has edited his bio on purpose. Previous attempts to edit have failed. Can you please help me know how to edit his bio to delete things that are not true? 80.0.74.27 (talk) 12:56, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Please use reliable sources, to learn more. SoyokoAnis - talk 13:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Greenville Public Library

The absorption ten years ago could easily be cited. Its membership requires a lookup in the new system and cannot. You seemed to have missed my edit note and the nature of my first edit.

172.56.13.229 (talk) 12:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Please use reliable sources, to learn more. SoyokoAnis - talk 13:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

how do you suggest i cite a database lookup? 172.56.13.229 (talk) 13:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

I suggest finding another source that would prove what edit you're trying to make. SoyokoAnis - talk 13:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Redwarn usage

SoyokoAnis,

I'm disappointed to see that you've returned to using RedWarn without seeking any advice on this topic before hand, at least that I'm aware of. I've already noticed several bad reverts, including restoring bad grammar, removing sourced additions without adequate reason, reverting an IP as good faith but simply warning them they didn't use an edit summary (No information on why their edit was already bad), reverting plot edits as lacking sources (Plots are primary sourced by nature). Not all of your reverts are bad, but enough are that something needs said. If you're going to do this against all advice not to, PLEASE limit your reverting efforts to completely obvious vandalism. DanCherek. -- ferret (talk) 14:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

@Ferret I have removed the RedWarn script from my js. I undestand what I've done was wrong. SoyokoAnis - talk 14:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for removing it; I strongly recommend keeping it disabled for the foreseeable future and focusing on things other than patrolling recent changes, maintenance work, or other gnoming. I agree with everything ferret said, 100%. Many of your recent reverts didn't make sense and your terse replies above to new editors were not actually addressing their concerns. I have no doubt you're operating in good faith, but I don't want to see you risk getting re-blocked for similar reasons as your original block, especially as it would be much harder to successfully appeal this time around. DanCherek (talk) 14:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danganronpa Decadence (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

the mere release does not make it notable. please show independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danganronpa Decadence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danganronpa Decadence, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 17:22, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, SoyokoAnis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 17:22, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thank you for your help with the Birthday Committee! Bobherry Talk Edits 02:07, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

BluSmart

Hello, SoyokoAnis. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for BluSmart at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 23:07, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

@Baffle gab1978 Sorry I'm late, thanks for the copyedit. It looks better than it was before. SoyokoAnis - talk 22:04, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! SoyokoAnis - talk 06:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Excuse me?

What’s this? are you dictating to me on what my !vote should be? or commanding me to change my !vote? Celestina007 (talk) 23:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

@Celestina007 Based on your message, I thought you we're suggesting a draftify. So instead recommended a draftify vote. Apologies, and happy editing. SoyokoAnis - talk | PLEASE PING 12:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

@Celestina007 I just realized that I pinged the wrong person, I am so sorry. I had meant to ping the person above my message. Once again, so sorry. SoyokoAnis - talk | PLEASE PING 18:31, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Danganronpa Decadence

Hello, SoyokoAnis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Danganronpa Decadence, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Danganronpa Decadence

Hello, SoyokoAnis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danganronpa Decadence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

{{Computer death}} on your userpage

Hey there. I noticed you have the template computer death on your userpage. The source on the page is: "{{Computer death|Currently without a computer any may receive a new one within a month or two.|name=SoyokoAnis}}". Thing is, that template doesn't expect a parameter, so that middle statement is ignored and not rendered anywhere.

Considering you're on a wikibreak from not having a computer it's unlikely you'll read this before you get it back and just remove it entirely anyway but I figured I'd let you know. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 02:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

@Snowmanonahoe Thank you for telling me! SoyokoAnis - talk | PLEASE PING 20:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing SoyokoAnis a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 17:34, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! SoyokoAnis - talk | PLEASE PING 15:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC)