User talk:Southronite

Welcome

Hello, Southronite, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 20:04, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to States' rights, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:46, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was not blanking the article, I simply forgot to write my reason. The section too long and was needlessly repeating the same information.--Southronite (talk) 20:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

those are not very good reasons--there was little repetition. "Too long" is too vague and not helpful. Rjensen (talk) 22:32, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3R alert-- if you engage in edit wars by erasing materials you risk getting blocked. Rjensen (talk) 05:04, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revivalry

Please see my entry about the Revivalry on its talk page. The name "Revivalry" was used for 70 years before the demise of the Southwest Conference - where do you think David Ubben got it in the first place? It was in common, traditional use long before any of us were born. Just because something can't be found by a cursory internet search doesn't mean it isn't accurate. Please see my entry in the Revivalry talk section. This name is a tradition that goes back to Ad-Ran (TCU's original name)-Baylor's first games as religious schools. The Moody Blue (Talk) 21:43, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Baylor–TCU football rivalry

Southronite, I see that you went ahead and moved the article to your preferred title before the discussion was closed. As you've run into this issue before, I really recommend you read up on the WP:MOVE and WP:RM. You should never unilaterally move a page when it's clearly controversial - ie, when the previous name was decided by a discussion, or as in this case, when there's a currently ongoing discussion that you yourself started. Please do not move anymore articles before becoming familiar with the procedure; let me know if you have any questions.--Cúchullain ^t/c 13:55, 13 August 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Southronite. You have new messages at Cuchullain's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Boston College Eagles football seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Hart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2010 Chick-fil-A Kickoff Game for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2010 Chick-fil-A Kickoff Game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Chick-fil-A Kickoff Game until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 01:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Southronite. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Southronite. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SMU Mustangs football under J. Burton Rix for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SMU Mustangs football under J. Burton Rix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMU Mustangs football under J. Burton Rix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jweiss11 (talk) 23:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]