User talk:Southkept

Welcome!

Hello, Southkept, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 05:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I think you're supposed to get a paste of a standard welcome message... I've never welcomed anyone before so I hope you'll forgive me for not including it. I also don't think you really need it... ;)

I just wanted to say thank you for your statement on the evidence page on the EI / CAMERA affair. The evidence I have matches what you had, but the fact that Wikipedians for Palestine seemed paraniod about infiltration was not quite as strong without your testimony. It probably makes zero difference to the case, but it validates the research I did and the conclusions I drew. As a researcher you seldom get clear cut evidence like that (either to prove or disprove the hypothesis)... so thank you for sharing it.

Incidently I'm not sure if you'll get this given that this account (from your own evidence) appears to be a fresh account (I doubt that qualifies as a sock puppet, but who knows... every one is paranoid now!) created for the purpose of posting the evidence without bringing your indentity as an editor into the equation. If this isn't acceptable in policy... it probably should be! :)

All the best and thank you again. Oboler (talk) 21:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: [1] - the jpg is after they deleted the 2008 e-mail archive - including many e-mails during April 2008 (the time the infiltration took place into CAMERA).

Please note that "wiki for Palestine" is just one group. There are others on ton of mailing lists on yahoo, riseup.net and so forth: It is impossible to know what groups are there, what they do, why they do it, how many admins they have control over etc…same about private e-mails.

The only read evidence we have before us is the end result: wikipedia articles. Some articles are closely guarded by several people who push any outside influence to the point that users are discouraged from participating in the edit process. --Southkept (talk) 13:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... you seem to have more information on this. I'd be interested in having a list of such groups that you do know about if you are willing to share it... I actually have a book on Web 2.0 coming out towards the end of the year, the Wikipedia section is still on the to do list. If you want to e-mail, there is a button on my profile. Thanks for checking your talk page as well. :) Oboler (talk) 13:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many emails? Really? According to this google cache from April 7, 2008 the grand total of posts made in 2008 up to that point was zero. In fact, the grand total for at least the 7 months prior to April 7, 2008 was zero. According to this screenshot posted by Juanita on May 9th, closeup here the grand total of posts in April was a mighty 3. 3 is not "many" except for those people who can't count beyond 2. In 15 of the 28 months that wikiforpalestine existed (or more than half) no posts were made at all. For the remaining 13 months the median number of posts made a month were 3 - you can't plan a conspiracy making only 3 posts a month, I don't think. In short, Israpedia had more posts in one month than wikiforpalestine had in 28 - you're hard pressed to make a case that the two are equivalent. 65.95.117.75 (talk) 03:29, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It could be that once contacts are made then correspondence can be done by other means thus making you mean meaningless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.21.249.114 (talk) 04:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Just FYI. See [2] as it concerns you. Oboler (talk) 06:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Muhammad al-Durrah do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' (link(s): http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2008/05/al-dura-case-overturned-on-appeal.html) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 16:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

I'm not certain how long you've actually been on-wikipedia, but I should let you know that you are in violation of the three-revert rule. If you revert the page again, you will be reported. CJCurrie (talk) 04:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New account

This user is now evidently editing as Julia1987 (talk · contribs).[3] --El on ka 17:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]