User talk:SouthBlrBoy

Your submission at Articles for creation: Invenio Origin (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Invenio Origin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 14:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, SouthBlrBoy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 14:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, SouthBlrBoy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Invenio Origin, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

Thank you for your comment, I deeply appreciate it. How can I establish that I am not connected to the subject of the article? The most there is to be disclosed is that they are a second degree connection (hence an organisation that I know of, and hence, the judgment that such an organisation must have a wikipedia page so a neutral, consolidated view of them can be found online which would be useful for a large number of people searching about them - also considering there will be many others contributing to this page/making changes in the future, ensuring this isn't a one sided view of them). I have so far never met/interacted/transacted with the subject. I understand this does not rule out a future such possibility. So request you to kindly guide me on what procedure to follow - should I play it safe and declare COI anyway though there is no conflict far as I am aware?

Thanks! SouthBlrBoy (talk) 08:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi @SouthBlrBoy. If there is no conflict of interest we can take your word for it and you don't have to do anything. Thank you for letting us know. Qcne (talk) 08:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Great, thanks! SouthBlrBoy (talk) 08:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Maybe there is a case of mistaken identity. A user on IRC channel #wikipedia-en-help was asking for help with this draft and also explained that they were one of the founding directors of Invenio. Since you were the only contributor to the draft, I guessed you were both the same person. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Oh, that's interesting. No, I have had no interaction/connection with Invenio Origin so far. I'm glad/relieved we stand clarified. SouthBlrBoy (talk) 12:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Invenio Origin has been accepted

Invenio Origin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 08:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC)