User talk:Sourcelat0r

Regarding 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash numbers

You seem to be knowledge about this matter, so I was wondering if you could lend a hand. I'm not in a position to do it myself because of confusion surrounding the number of passengers/crew.

Could you perhaps cite & correct the number of passengers? The infobox says 90, whereas the main text says 89.

Thanks. -Frazzydee|✍ 07:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note about language. Sorry I can't find it - where is it in the article? I must be blind. -Chumchum7 (talk) 19:57, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-Ok, works for me, if I find a better source will post that one instead.Jman279 (talk) 21:33, 13 April 2010 (UTC) does this work as a source for conspiracy theories? http://en.rian.ru/world/20100412/158539458.html[reply]

But this just quotes the Daily Mail article (very briefly). It is not a new source. Sourcelat0r (talk) 21:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help, figured its better to ask then just repost, found the discussion section on the conspiracy theories now though.Jman279 (talk) 21:47, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

T:TDYK

If you create a new article that is not a stub, please don't hesitate to add it to T:TDYK, so it can be featured on our main page. Thank you for your contributions, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash

There was a large block of citations removed and I reverted to get that back. There were some intervening edits lost, but they're minor compared to the citations. I re-did the template fixes that were in there. I'm thinking you see this all, so no problem. Cheers, Jack Merridew 20:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. I did not mean to revert you. Sourcelat0r (talk) 20:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Autostrada A2 (Poland)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Autostrada A2 (Poland) , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going to the article and clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 83.242.88.168 (talk) 11:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SLV images

Thanks for finding and uploading those Allan Green images from the SLV. Just one note, left-aligned images shouldn't be directly under a section heading (I'm sure its in the Manual of Style somewhere, but can'd find the exact bit to point you at). Putting it in a paragraph down is usually the way to solve this. -- saberwyn 02:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice, I will follow it. Sourcelat0r (talk) 02:17, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]