User talk:Sourav bhattacharyya/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Sourav bhattacharyya. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Sourav bhattacharyya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like St xavier's institution panihati, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ベリット ^話せます 15:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of St xavier's institution panihati

A tag has been placed on St xavier's institution panihati requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ベリット ^話せます 15:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Windows 7, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 16:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of St xavier's institution panihati

A tag has been placed on St xavier's institution panihati requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. F (talk) 08:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Windows XP, you will be blocked from editing. Amplitude101 (talk) 11:45, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of St xavier's institution panihati

A tag has been placed on St xavier's institution panihati requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. (GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 15:23, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your text here.}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 17:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sourav bhattacharyya2 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. (GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 01:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sourav the great for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. (GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 15:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sourav bhattacharyya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit that i have done wrong and hurt the sentiments of the wikipedia community.As a newcomer i frankly misjudged the value of this encyclopedia to the wikipedians.Being blocked for a long time,I have learnt my lesson and hereby make the promise that I would respect all the rules of the community and refrain from any acts which are considered in bad faith.Honestly speaking i tried to make constructive edits through the account Sourav the great but i have been accused of sockpuppetry.However any administrator can check that i didnot make a single vandal attempt but made constructive efforts.Considering these situations,I would be highly grateful if any kind administrator would consider my situation and lift the block.Thank you for your time and patience

Decline reason:

You have used at least four accounts (Sourav the Great, Sourav bhattacharyya, Sourav bhattacharyya1 and Sourav bhattacharryya2), and this is block evasion, which is not acceptable. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 19:37, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I begin with my sincere apologies to the wikipedia community.I can honestly say that i did not know about the guilt in having multiple accounts in wikipedia.It was only a matter of time before I found out that i had been accused of sockpuppetry.'It is justified that many admins would consider this block evasion but the truth is that I wanted to make a fresh start in contributing to wikipedia through another username.'In the other accounts I have used especially "sourav the great" I have made significant contributions to atleast one article.Therefore i would be highly grateful if any administrator would kindly consider my inexperience with wikipedia policies and give me a second chance to prove myself by setting a fixed duration to the indefinite block or lifting it.Also if time and patience permits please answer this question "If the bock is indefinite, will I never be able to edit in wikipedia?"Thank you and please make the decision which seems right in you conscience.}}

Please clarify your comment. You say that you wished to make a fresh start; please explain to us why you believed that you needed to do so; also please explain what you believed the previously applied blocks actually meant. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 14:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

I put this enquiry to you, in addition to A. Bradbury's: If unblocked, what areas of the encyclopedia would you anticipate contributing to? Additionally, would you be willing to voluntarily agree to refrain from editing through an account other than this one (without notifying an administrator)? AGK 20:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Block reset to 48 hours. Given your promise to stick to one account, there is no need to block you more than for the period that would be appropriate given the vandalism you did. Fair warning, though: if you return to vandalism edits like this you will be blocked.

Request handled by: Mango juice^talk 23:28, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

REPLY

To Anthony.bradbury

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION IN THIS REGARD.As i have already said I am very new to wikipedia policies(only 10 days since i have registered).When I was blocked indefinitely,I checked the wikipedia for its meaning and found out that such blocks do not have any fixed duration and are rarely lifted.So I thought that there was no point in contesting the block as my request was likely to be declined.Honestly,I can assure you that i did not know that blocked users were prohibited from having multiple accounts.In my view,it seemed reasonable to create another account and I felt that if I did not misbehave in the other account,there would not be any further issues on this matter(although now i know that it was a wrong thing to do according to wikipedia policies).It was only recently that i came to know that accusation for sockpuppetry was in no way related to one's conduct in the account.Thus all I want to say is that I created the other accounts due to my unfamiliarity with wikipedia policies,and now i want to do the right thing i.e (request this account to be unblocked.I would be highly grateful if you would consider my situation and take action in this regard.Thank you very much for your time and patience.Sourav bhattacharyya (talk) 02:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

To AGK

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION IN THIS REGARD.As i have said earlier,I am willing to abide by wikipedia policies and I agree to voluntarily refrain from editing through the other accounts that i have if I am unblocked.I want to contribute by creating articles about many important things in my own country (India) that has gone unmentioned in wikipedia.Other than that i would also try my level best to correct any article and add more information if needed.Thus i want wikipedia to be a broad based encyclopedia covering topics from every part of the world.So,i would request you to please look into the matter and take an appropriate decision.Thank you very much for your time and patience.Sourav bhattacharyya (talk) 02:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of St. Xavier's Institution (Panihati)

I have nominated St. Xavier's Institution (Panihati), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Xavier's Institution (Panihati). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 20:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC)