User talk:SouperAwesome

y helo thar!

Heya. So, yeah... couldn't find the info for my old Wiki account. Started a new one. >_>
Dominixis 07:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, SouperAwesome, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 18:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, about "TimeSplitters" references...

Good job creating that page; I just hope it will be able to stay up. Also, I feel it should reflect all of the TimeSplitters games instead of one. I feel doing so will be more relevant and perhaps increase its notability. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 18:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool. I just wanted to suggest that maybe it should cover the whole TimeSplitters series instead of one game, like I stated above. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 19:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome

As far what to do, the best advice I can give in this case is to ignore them. Since it's a dynamic IP address, they can't be permanently blocked, so you just have to keep an eye out and report further harrassment to an administrator. This kind of stuff can happen to anyone - I get regular weird harrassment from someone from the University of Cincinatti, and spillover from harrassment of another user. Just keep your chin up and deny attention. Natalie 11:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References to media in TimeSplitters Future Perfect

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article References to media in TimeSplitters Future Perfect, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clyde (talk) 22:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hello, SouperAwesome! I see that you have expressed an interest in being adopted by an experienced editor. I accept your request, being an experienced editor myself. Whether you want to learn about wiki markup, find something to do, or just talk to somebody, I'm the one you can talk to - just leave a message on my talk page. Good luck with Wikipedia! Lemme know if you accept by leaving a message on my talk page. --Milton 00:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty, sounds good! I've changed the tag on your page to reflect that. I see you've already gotten the welcome post on your talk page (scroll up) so I won't repeat that. Anywho, that's a really great place to start, and has a surprisingly large amount of good information. I'm new at this adoption bit, so I'm not sure what all to do, but feel free to leave any questions you have for me on my talk page, and I should respond within the day. Regards, --Milton 05:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hey, this how-to deals with 'Pedia - Commons images, which I think is what you're looking for. The thirteenth step deals with {{NowCommons}}, which may help. Really, you don't need to change the link, but if you want to, that should be where you want to look. The main reason to put stuff on Commons is so other Wikis can use it. Lemme know if you need anything else. --Milton 22:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. --Milton 05:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly written articles

I'd use {{tone}}, or perhaps {{wikify}}. If it's especially bad (mixture of languages, continuous bad grammar, etc), you can post it on WP:CLEAN. --Milton 05:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Powderfinger related edits

File:PFlogo.svg

Hi! I've seen you editing Powderfinger related articles, and would like to invite you to join WikiProject Powderfinger, an effort by Wikipedians to improve the band's coverage on the encyclopedia. Please consider signing up here.

Giggy ^{Talk | Review} 22:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Super Mario RPG lists

You asked why List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars was redirected to Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars in Talk:Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars. I have restored the list of locations, and we are discussing it on its talk page. Could you please take a look? If you have time, please also look at List of characters in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars and Smithy Gang. Thanks! Taric25 00:40, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars has two lists pertaining to it (List of characters in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars, and List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars). User:TTN decided it would be best to merge the lists into the main article and split Smithy Gang into those articles. I recently merged Smithy Gang into the list of chatacters by removing the non-notable characters, and I have asserted that a cameo section in the list of characters is valid, per Wikipedia:Trivia sections and Wikipedia:Handling trivia that uses Alex Trebek#Cameos as a good example. I have suggested that we rename the articles per Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting potentially controversial moves to something along the lines of Characters of Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars and World of Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars or Mushroom Kingdom (Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars) just like Characters of Final Fantasy VIII and World of Final Fantasy VI or Gaia (Final Fantasy VII). I believe if these articles are to evolve beyond a non-notable list, they should be renamed. For example, List of Final Fantasy VII locations was merged into Gaia (Final Fantasy VII), because a World article is notable, but a simple list of locations is not. That is why there are other secions of the article to make it a World article. It simply has not been renamed yet.

TTN believes the citations in the development and reception sections of the list of locations, books and magazines, are trivial sources. When I added that the 3D perspective of the game is reminicent of Equinox to the main article, TTN removed it since my souce was "the opinions of the Nintendo Power player's guide writers". Although it was actually Nintendo Power magazine, I do believe a magazine is a reliable source, and I gave a page from Next Generation Magazine which also said the same thing. In addition, I was surprized that TTN said that it was from the players guide, since he claims to own the players guide for the game. He has not verified this, since I asked him for citations in May, "Could you look in the back of the Player's Guide and tell me what “types” of … Magic? I forgot what they call it in the game … well, anyways, what types of Special Attack or whatever it is (actually, could you find out what it's called?) there are? I remember some vaguely when I owned the guide like “Fire”, “Jump”, “Electricity?”, etc. Could you provide a citation, like the page number with a quote in context?" TTN replied that he was going to "get to it" (User talk:TTN/Archive 5#List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars). TTN claims the player's guide is "at the bottom of a box that's behind at least five others in a cramped space". Seeing that TTN did not recognize that the page was not from the player's guide when I provided a scan of the page in question from Nintendo Power shocked me. However, I have continued to assume good faith by not questioning TTN's honesty.

Per Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus can change, I have offered five different reasonable, temporary compromises that might integrate my idea with TTN's.

Go over the list of characters so we can delete non–notable characters
Rename the articles by following the steps at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting potentially controversial moves.
Cut down the geography section list of locations by cutting it into the regional maps the adventures use when traveling from one to another. I can get pictures and write the fair use rationals, and someone can cut down the text that has no citation and does not allude to other media.
Write the concept and creation and reception sections for the list of characters
Write the concept and creation section for the main article

TTN rejected my compromise because it still keeps the articles. I agreed I would consider a redirect, but Wikipedia:Article size does not allow that, since the list of locations is currently 82 KB long. Instead, I agreed to help cut down the geography section that is the bulk of the article, but TTN rejected that as well because TTN states, "I am not interested in working on the article in regards to improving it." and "get past this "having sources automatically means that this information is good" mentality." TTN states, "I don't think they have or will ever assert notability." I have replied with, "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so if you don't think the articles will ever assert notability, we cannot yet know this, per Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#I don't like it.

Would you please take a look at Talk:Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars and give us your thoughts? Taric25 01:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I also noticed you're in the Adopt-a-User program. ☺ User:Matthew Yeager is my adopter. Taric25 01:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Super Mario RPG lists

Hello, I'm leaving you this message, because I noticed your adoptee in the Adopt-a-user program recently edited Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars, so I thought you might like to know that currently, Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars has two lists pertaining to it (List of characters in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars, and List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars). User:TTN decided it would be best to merge the lists into the main article and split Smithy Gang into those articles. I recently merged Smithy Gang into the list of chatacters by removing the non-notable characters, and I have asserted that a cameo section in the list of characters is valid, per Wikipedia:Trivia sections and Wikipedia:Handling trivia that uses Alex Trebek#Cameos as a good example. I have suggested that we rename the articles per Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting potentially controversial moves to something along the lines of Characters of Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars and World of Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars or Mushroom Kingdom (Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars) just like Characters of Final Fantasy VIII and World of Final Fantasy VI or Gaia (Final Fantasy VII). I believe if these articles are to evolve beyond a non-notable list, they should be renamed. For example, List of Final Fantasy VII locations was merged into Gaia (Final Fantasy VII), because a World article is notable, but a simple list of locations is not. That is why there are other secions of the article to make it a World article. It simply has not been renamed yet.

TTN believes the citations in the development and reception sections of the list of locations, books and magazines, are trivial sources. When I added that the 3D perspective of the game is reminicent of Equinox to the main article, TTN removed it since my souce was "the opinions of the Nintendo Power player's guide writers". Although it was actually Nintendo Power magazine, I do believe a magazine is a reliable source, and I gave a page from Next Generation Magazine which also said the same thing. In addition, I was surprized that TTN said that it was from the players guide, since he claims to own the players guide for the game. He has not verified this, since I asked him for citations in May, "Could you look in the back of the Player's Guide and tell me what “types” of … Magic? I forgot what they call it in the game … well, anyways, what types of Special Attack or whatever it is (actually, could you find out what it's called?) there are? I remember some vaguely when I owned the guide like “Fire”, “Jump”, “Electricity?”, etc. Could you provide a citation, like the page number with a quote in context?" TTN replied that he was going to "get to it" (User talk:TTN/Archive 5#List of locations in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars). TTN claims the player's guide is "at the bottom of a box that's behind at least five others in a cramped space". Seeing that TTN did not recognize that the page was not from the player's guide when I provided a scan of the page in question from Nintendo Power shocked me. However, I have continued to assume good faith by not questioning TTN's honesty.

Per Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus can change, I have offered five different reasonable, temporary compromises that might integrate my idea with TTN's.

Go over the list of characters so we can delete non–notable characters
Rename the articles by following the steps at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting potentially controversial moves.
Cut down the geography section list of locations by cutting it into the regional maps the adventures use when traveling from one to another. I can get pictures and write the fair use rationals, and someone can cut down the text that has no citation and does not allude to other media.
Write the concept and creation and reception sections for the list of characters
Write the concept and creation section for the main article

TTN rejected my compromise because it still keeps the articles. I agreed I would consider a redirect, but Wikipedia:Article size does not allow that, since the list of locations is currently 82 KB long. Instead, I agreed to help cut down the geography section that is the bulk of the article, but TTN rejected that as well because TTN states, "I am not interested in working on the article in regards to improving it." and "get past this "having sources automatically means that this information is good" mentality." TTN states, "I don't think they have or will ever assert notability." I have replied with, "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so if you don't think the articles will ever assert notability, we cannot yet know this, per Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#I don't like it.

Would you please take a look at Talk:Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars and give us your thoughts? By the way, I User:Matthew Yeager is my adopter. Taric25 01:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fables from a Mayfly: What I Tell You Three Times Is True

According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Album and song titles and band names the title is correct as it stands right now... from and a are lower case and 'Is' is upper case. The mis-capitalization is ignored in the article title, although it is normally mentioned/used in the article itself. Even though the groups/bands/etc. may use incorrectly use capitalization, the errors are not carried over to the article titles herein. SkierRMH 16:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks, I hadn't known about that! SouperAwesome 10:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting my merges

Why did you revert the Whispy Woods and Dyna Blade merges? - A Link to the Past (talk) 16:13, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There were no specific discussions on merging these articles, but there were for other Kirby articles, and I used those to merge these. Anyway, looking at Dyna Blade, she's only in a couple games and the anime, certainly not significant enough to warrant her own article. - A Link to the Past (talk) 16:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair to Midland

It's okay! Don't worry about it. XD FallenWings47 7:14, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Should vs. Must

WP policy allows you to blank the page after you have read the messages and there is no obligation to archive. Please do not alter my talk page again. Thanks. Bluefield 12:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi there! I just want to let you know that your adding of electronica could be wrong. As the album only has elements of electronica, I would consider it a sub-genre. So I am taking it off. That's all, pretty minor issue. Anyways I'm deciding on putting this expanded version of Hybrid Theory up as an FA candidate. Please reply to tell me what you think. Thanks for your time! (SUDUSER)₈₅ 12:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

– The style of music is generalized as nu metal. As I can also comprehend, not every song in there is nu metal, thus the inclusion of alternative metal. As for electronica, just because things such as electronic drums and synth sounds are in their songs, it does not classify as electronica. I'm a fan of the Nine Inch Nails and they have alot of the elements in their songs too. But they're not electronica. Electronica is groups like Chemical Brothers, Daft Punk and AIR. I hope you understood my point. As for the FA, that's why I'm setting up a peer review first. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 13:32, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

– As I mentioned before: thus the inclusion of alternative metal. Thanks for understanding! (SUDUSER)₈₅ 13:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
– You didn't comprehend me? I stated: “As for electronica, just because things such as electronic drums and synth sounds are in their songs, it does not classify as electronica. I'm a fan of the Nine Inch Nails and they have alot of the elements in their songs too. But they're not electronica.” Every band out there has probably used electronic instruments in the songs at least once! The can only be really classified as electronica if their songs are electronic drums, keyboard loops and synth sounds from start to finish. It is common for rock bands to electronic instruments, okay? I hope I made this clear, I know this is a heavily dubious topic between many, but that's the way it is. The are rock bands if guitars and drums dominate their songs. So, can we end this? (SUDUSER)₈₅ 14:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
– The loops are nothing. If you want to see a difference, listen to songs by Chemical Brothers, Daft Punk etc. and compare them with Linkin Park. Bottom line: Linkin Park is a ROCK band, and though Cure for the Itch is the only purely electronic, it is the only one and thus does not count. End of story. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 14:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
– I did mention that in the Songs section about the electronic elements. Couldn't find solid refs for Cure for the Itch though. That's too bad. I hoped that the copy of Rolling Stone from 2002 had something. But it had nothing. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 14:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I copied our discussion into the talk page. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 16:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remade songs

Hey there! I think instead of creating a separate section for remade tracks, it would look better being interpreting the data in to the “Recording and production” section. The reason is it doesn't have many sources to back it up. The fact that I actually found that “Complete Linkin Park discography” ref was a fucking milestone. I would like you to help me with it. Oh, the first review is up at Hybrid Theory's PR! Take a look to see what the javascript program has highlighted, that's what I'm doing. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 14:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

—And also some of the info in the "Remade tracks" section incorporate the info I already added in the "Recording and production". For example:"The Hybrid Theory demo CD that was sent to record companies also included several early versions of Hybrid Theory songs," "In some cases, the songs were almost completely rewritten, keeping few of their original elements." et cetera. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suduser85 (talk • contribs) 14:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

—On second thought, the info isn't needed at all. The article already states that the tracks on the album were re-recordings of songs from the demo tapes. Too much detail isn't needed in my opinion :-) (SUDUSER)₈₅ 15:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

remade

Interpreting the individual names of the tracks on the demo and signifying which tracks on the album they evolved to is definitely too much unwanted info. I mean you don't see FAs like Dookie and Californication (album) mention the titles of the original demos of the songs. Bottom line: The tracks on demos aren't really significant. So, I'm taking it out, I hope that's OK. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 14:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This line simply states: ““Xero” released one sampler tape which never surfaced into the mainstream.”

I have a strong feeling that should be enough.(SUDUSER)₈₅ 14:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I think that what's mentioned in the short sentences is enough.(SUDUSER)₈₅ 15:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not demonstrating article ownership or being immature. I'm just saying that because no one has any liable refs that can actually say more about the Xero demos. I am in no way demonstrating "article ownership". I don't believe in that sorta crap, articles are for anyone, just like candy :-) I've been searching "Xero" on Yahoo! for more than three fucking months! They're an independent band, LP is the major label artist. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 15:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Man, you're one hell of a fast typer :-) OK fine, I guess I was a little harsh to revert every single thing you added. I guess I goin' fucking crazy over this whole FA thing, I accept your apology and I too apologize. Hey, anyways I'm still waiting for that copyeditor that Xihix told me about. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 15:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC}

Anyways, you seem pretty qualified as an editor. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 15:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LEAD

Do you think we can do more for the lead section? I asking because the PR says it needs expansion. I mean articles like The Office (US TV series) and Arrested Development (TV series) have leads the same length as Hybrid Theory. What do you think? (SUDUSER)₈₅ 08:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crocs

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DragonForce

hey man i noticed you supplied the picture for the Dragonforce show. i was wondering if you had anymore photo's from that show i was there too! didn't score any myself unfortunatley.
well hit me back if you can help me out
User:Carbonatedwater User talk:Carbonatedwater 10.28pm 15 Janruary 2008

Project Chanology

Can we please wait on adding this new stuff until it gets coverage in secondary sources? Trust me, you want to hear this coming from me as opposed to someone else, and it will come from someone else, if not now, then later. We want this article meticulously sourced, and to avoid primary sources as much as possible, to make everything in the article as cited/sourced/iron-clad as possible. Remember, the YouTube link may or may not be permanent - but citing secondary sources, whether or not the links online go dead - are permanent. Someone can always go to a library and look up magazine archives, you can't really do that with YouTube vids after they are removed. Best to write this article, from the start so it is the best it can be. Cirt (talk) 13:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I put a message on the article's talk page and saw your message on my page after I saved it. Check it out :) SouperAwesome (talk) 13:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on article's talk. (Rest of relevant thread is there). Cirt (talk) 14:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flogging Molly

As you're the one who's made the changes, what is your source for Flogging Molly's Dave King & Bridget Regan actually tying the knot, and that Regan is taking King's name? Thanks. All I'm able to find on the subject is a Livejournal post regarding the WP changes and a widely distributed Associated Press article from mid-March referring to Regan as King's "eventual wife" neither of which are proof. Adding the source would be much appreciated, thanks! Salamurai (talk) 03:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Actually, I'm afraid I don't have an external source at the moment. I was at their show in Melbourne on Friday the 11th, and Dave said they were married "4 days ago in Tokyo" and that "it's Bridget King now!" I did a quick search around when I added it but didn't see anything. SouperAwesome (talk) 05:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hybrid Theory is not hip hop

The album is not hip hop get it throug your freaking head. It's rap metal. --Freedom (song) (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Don't be dum. Chester sings and Mike raps on all the songs. That can't make the album hip hop they mixe rock and metal that means it's rap rock, rapcore or rap metal choose but it's not hip hop. --Freedom (song) (talk) 18:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LEARN YOUR GENRES PLEASE

Enough said.--SilverOrion (talk) 12:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bridget Regan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bridget Regan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bridget Regan

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bridget Regan, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridget Regan. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tim Buckley (artist)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Tim Buckley (artist). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Buckley (artist) (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]