User talk:Soupboneh

Welcome!

Hello, Soupboneh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Pet Protection Agreement, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ironholds (talk) 00:16, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pet Protection Agreement

A tag has been placed on Pet Protection Agreement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ironholds (talk) 00:16, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest policy

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 02:51, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Rachel Hirschfeld (attorney). Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Flowanda | Talk 09:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 04:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OpenAir PM New York's Newspaper 1996.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kanuk (talk) 14:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Soupboneh, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OpenAir PM New York's Newspaper 1996 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OpenAir PM New York's Newspaper 1996, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OpenAir PM New York's Newspaper 1996 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OpenAir PM New York's Newspaper 1996, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OpenAir PM New York's Newspaper 1996 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OpenAir PM New York's Newspaper 1996, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pet Protection Agreement (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Soupboneh/Pet Protection Agreement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Soupboneh/Pet Protection Agreement, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispe ring 22:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Soupboneh/Pet Protection Agreement

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Soupboneh/Pet Protection Agreement, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Whispe ring 22:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rachel Hirschfeld, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Evita and Love Thy Neighbor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cease and desist

Your repeated addition of unsourced and promotional content to the Rachel Hirschfeld article is a cause of serious concern. Ms. Hirschfeld is a living person, and in such cases, Wikipedia maintains strict sourcing, neutrality, and verifiability requirements as set forth at WP:BLP. Accordingly, addition of content that is either unsourced or promotional is impermissible. Exacerbating these concerns, your user name mirrors the name of the subject's rescue dog (Soubpone Hirschfeld) and raises questions with respect to whether you are or have a close connection with the article's subject. Indeed, your user page discloses that you "have been paid by Soupbone Charities" for your edits. From its web site (here), it appears that "Soubpone Charities" is created or operated by, or in other manner closely affiliated with, Rachel Hirschfeld. This raises further concerns under Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy found at WP:COI. Please be advised that Wikipedia is not a forum for vanity articles, nor for the use of paid editors to create vanity articles. For these reasons, I intend to revert the Hirschfeld article to its sourced status as of January 21, prior to the insertion of the unsourced and promotional material. Should you continue to insert unsourced and promotional material, your account may be subject to sanctions, including blocking as set forth in Wikipedia:Blocking policy. If you believe anything in this message is based on erroneous information, please set forth your explanation here on this Talk page. Cbl62 (talk) 18:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying response left at User talk:Cbl62. Cbl62 (talk) 18:58, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Below I am copying issues relating to the edits you have made and I am answering just under the issue you posed.

1. content that is either unsourced or promotional is impermissible.

All that I wrote is from my knowledge, however, I will site sources from my articles and interviews, if you wish.

2. Exacerbating these concerns, your user name mirrors the name of the subject's rescue dog (Soubpone Hirschfeld) and raises questions with respect to whether you are or have a close connection with the article's subject.

I own my name and creations and Soupbone

3. Indeed, your user page discloses that you "have been paid by Soupbone Charities" for your edits.

I, Rachel Hirschfeld, have not been paid by Soupbone Charities although I do remember stating that. Because I thought Wikipedia needed to hear that. But it definitely is not the case. I have not been paid although I could be, because it own them both.

4. From its web site (here), it appears that "Soubpone Charities" is created/operated by Rachel Hirschfeld.

This is correct.

May I add the updated edits of my article here for your approval - because I do not want to risk being blocked?"

You should clarify your user page (User:Soupboneh) to indicate that your connection to the subject and paid/unpaid status. If there is specific content you wish to have added to the Hirschfeld article, you can list it either here or at the talk page for the Hirschfeld article. Bear in mind that citations to reliable sources are required for any content; unfortunately, your "own knowledge" does not qualify as a verifiable, reliable source under Wikipedia's core policies. Cbl62 (talk) 18:58, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]