User talk:SoulSinging

Please leave "Christian" out. (SEE DISCUSSION)

Please do not delete other people's comments on talk pages, as you did at talk:The Elms (band). It is considered vandalism, and you may be Blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue in this manner. Even if you don't like their opinion, please be civil and remember that they are entitled to it.

The specific diif is here--Ybbor ^T 13:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Elms

Most of what you had was unsourced material, or links that just pointed back to the article. Most of the stuff I removed here was unsourced; you don't need to list every band an artist has toured with unless it's a significant tour (e.g. "band x joined band y for the entirety of band y's summer 2010 tour"). Furthermore, removal of unreferenced material about a living person (or living people in this case) is generally acceptable. Also, it's proper English (at least American English) to use "The [name of band] is..." since you're referring to the band as a singular unit. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 22:44, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

___________________

Hello. Fair enough regarding the list of bands that The Elms have performed with; but because The Elms are still relatively unknown to many, it seems that establishing artistic and stylistic community by referencing other artists is something that a new reader could derive insight from. Also, using your logic that we don't have to list every band an artist toured with, why did you delete every single one, including high-profile events like Farm Aid 2008 (which can certainly be referenced)? All other bands' wikis reference their most high-profile performances. Regarding the English "is" vs. "are", it's simply a matter of proper Queen's English vs. more modernized American English. I'm more concerned about a growing, accurate knowledge base about a band that many have never heard of.

Regarding the statement "formerly known as 'Just Visiting'" - this is an erroneous statement, even if you've found reference to the contrary on AllMusic (AllMusic's information is incorrect). It is true that two members of The Elms were once in a band called Just Visiting, but The Elms is not simply a new incarnation of that band as insinuated by "formerly known as". Until adequate reference and factual presentation is made about these matters, they're misleading in their current form and should be deleted.

I am aware that you've got much more wikipedia experience than most, but I'm an enormous fan of The Elms. I've known their band members personally and can contribute very clear information on the band's existence (and in the future, will work to reference better). I've done nothing to you personally, I'm not sure why you feel the need to use terms like "clue-bat" when addressing me. I'm happy to discuss these matters with you, but ask that you please refrain from using petulant vernacular. If you simply apply your vast and obvious wiki understanding (where I, and others, lack knowledge) and our commitment to The Elms and succinct English (where you lack knowledge), we can certainly arrive at a credible and factual article. Fair? And if there's a better way to reply to your conversation, please advise. -SoulSinging

Okay, your last edits were better, but you can't use YouTube as a source. Everything else looks fine. Also, don't forget to sign your posts using four tildes (these things: ~~~~) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:17, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help. The reason YouTube was used as a source is simply because it can be used to accurately show the exact upload date of a video. Still not allowed? I can remove if you wish. If you're so inclined to help restore some of the articles you removed, we'd all be grateful.SoulSinging (talk) 20:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Project

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. In general, a person, group, organization or other material included in an article, such as on that which you edited, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, should be notable. If you wish to add a mention of such subjects, please confirm that they are notable according to Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Thank you. – Fayenatic London 19:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]