User talk:Sorry sir, that's classified information

Sorry sir, that's classified information, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sorry sir, that's classified information! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ashley Deen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashley Deen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Deen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cassiopeia talk 22:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tony Ferguson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 06:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please WP:Assume good faith before calling others vandals. I posted on the talk page of that article about why I deleted that information. It is indepedent research that constitutes WP:DOX under WP:BLP. --Sorry sir, that's classified information (talk) 02:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The warning is about you remove the sourced ranking info and btw DOX doesnot apply in BLP. Fianlly, do ping the editor who you want to send the message to so they receive a notification. Cassiopeia talk 09:05, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The warning was inappropriate, and you know it. You assumed bad faith, and you know it. That's because you think you WP:OWN MMA articles. You don't. My message was for everyone on the talk page concerning Tony Ferguson, not just you, but again that goes over your head because you think you own every MMA article. --Sorry sir, that's classified information (talk) 00:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody own any articles in Wikipedia including you and I and that is no evidence I own any articles including Tony Furguson -pls understand the OWN guidelines and other guidelines. This] changing the ranking which was incorrec/false info was the warning about. Pls check the source next time and I only reverted the ranking info - see here and not about the name, so you ANI was uncalled for and pls check the history log of the article prior and the procedures in Wikipedia is to bring the involved editor to the article talk page first and discuss the issue in civil manner and aim for a resolution (remember to ping the involved editor) and after many discussions and still find disruptive in the discussion you can involved other editor to comment. IF that still fail and still disruptive by other editor in the discussion, then go the ANI as ANI is the last resort to solve any issue. Cassiopeia talk 05:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]