User talk:SoricaNiChearnaigh

Your submission at Articles for creation: CyNMA (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SoricaNiChearnaigh/CyNMA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 10:05, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! SoricaNiChearnaigh, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 10:05, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CyNMA (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Arthur goes shopping was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SoricaNiChearnaigh/CyNMA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 07:16, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:SoricaNiChearnaigh/CyNMA

Hello, SoricaNiChearnaigh. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "CyNMA".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:SoricaNiChearnaigh/CyNMA}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 19:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. The article has already been deleted and I tried the second option you gave (pasting the code via a link) but there was nowhere available on that page to enter the code. The page does give me other options to request the article be restored. Not sure if this is the correct place to ask about this but here goes. I am creating this article because CyNMA (Cyprus Nurses and Midwives Association) have no information available in English and since they are part of the International Nurses Council, it seems relevant to add them - other Nursing organisations around the world have entries in Wikipedia. Basically in Cyprus things move v.slowly and I have been waiting many months for feedback from the organisation. My point is that I do not know when I will complete it. So, in your opinion, is it better to just recreate the article when I have all the information I need - will it be a problem now that there has been an article with the same name deleted? Or should I request the original be restored. Sorry if this is a stupid question, wikipedia is like another world - even more so after digging through their docs.

Thank you again for your help

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SoricaNiChearnaigh&action=edit&section=3#

Your submission at Articles for creation: CyNMA (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SeraphWiki was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more in-depth independent secondary sources to meet WP:NORG, most of these are primary sources and some fail verification or are address listings

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CyNMA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CyNMA, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SeraphWiki (talk) 22:17, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:CyNMA concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CyNMA, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:40, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved

Hello, I moved your article back to User:SoricaNiChearnaigh/sandbox as it was incorrectly moved to a subpage of the article space. Additionally, this article is not currently suitable to remain in the mainspace as it needs additional references and should adhere to the manual of style. Please let me know if you have any questions. Uhai (talk) 09:14, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Uhai,

I am confused how to publish, can you advise? SoricaNiChearnaigh (talk) 10:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I forgot to tag you {{Ping|Uhai}} SoricaNiChearnaigh (talk) 17:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to publish it as a snippet and it has 3 references from independent sources, what am I doing wrong? {{Ping|Uhai}} SoricaNiChearnaigh (talk) 17:53, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:SoricaNiChearnaigh/sandbox

Hello, SoricaNiChearnaigh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SoricaNiChearnaigh/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:SoricaNiChearnaigh/sandbox

Hello, SoricaNiChearnaigh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]