User talk:Sophiaabrahaomusic

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArthurRebelnatico, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Eeekster (talk) 23:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sophia Abrahão 2015.png

Thanks for uploading File:Sophia Abrahão 2015.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:47, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sophia Abrahão 15.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sophia Abrahão 15.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Fica a Dica, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eeekster (talk) 23:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TexasAndroid (talk) 12:54, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove tags placed on articles, like you did on Sophia Abrahão. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bicicleta e Melancia

The article Bicicleta e Melancia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

TV show with no info at all

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 17:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sophia Abrahão 2015.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sophia Abrahão 2015.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 18:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Flores (Sophia Abrahão song) with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 20:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Flores (Sophia Abrahão song) has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone your blanking of É Você. Please read the notice in the AfD box at the top of the page, where it says, "the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed". —C.Fred (talk) 20:15, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to O Reino das Vozes Que Não Se Calam, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:46, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to O Reino das Vozes Que Não Se Calam. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at O Reino das Vozes Que Não Se Calam. Eeekster (talk) 21:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:O-Reino-das-Vozes-Que-Não-Se-Calam.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:O-Reino-das-Vozes-Que-Não-Se-Calam.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sophia Abrahão 15.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sophia Abrahão 15.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:16, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:O-Reino-das-Vozes-Que-Não-Se-Calam.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:O-Reino-das-Vozes-Que-Não-Se-Calam.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]