User talk:Sophia.chu007/sandbox

Peer Review

Hi, it was kind of hard for me to assess what new content you added but everything in your sandbox looks good. Two points that could be expanded is 1. the chemistry of the amine absorption and the thermodynamics/kinetics that affect the CO2 loading capacity, etc. Especially since there is so much information on that in our textbook and because it is a common absorption method used. 2. Maybe expand on the CCS portion and talk about pivotal projects that have implemented amine absorption for large scale CO2 removal. Bettyhuu (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, good suggestions, Betty. -Dr. Went Mswent (talk) 05:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Everything here looks good. However, you don't have a lot of quantitative descriptions (some things to add might be operating cost, parasitic energy, cost/ton CO2 captured, heat of absorption, lifetime of solvent, etc.). Also, you describe loading capacity, but working capacity is a more useful metric for talking about absorbents/adsorbents, so maybe you could add that as well. Jesikatrese (talk) 08:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]