User talk:Soopdish

Welcome!

Hello, Soopdish! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! DVdm (talk) 18:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Soopdish, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Soopdish! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Black hole information paradox, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 11:39, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to General relativity: Conservation of energy is not understood the same way in general relativity as it is classically. See Friedmann equations#Equations where it says that conservation of energy (and linear momentum) is expressed in general by

$T^{\alpha \beta }{}_{;\beta }\,=0$

where T^αβ is the stress-energy tensor and, in the case of a uniformly expanding homogeneous and isotropic universe, by

${\dot {\rho }}=-3H\left(\rho +{\frac {p}{c^{2}}}\right)$

where ρ is mass density, H is the Hubble parameter, p is pressure, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. JRSpriggs (talk) 18:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Dark energy. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ChamithN (talk) 09:02, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Black hole information paradox. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.Waleswatcher (talk) 16:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Stonehenge. Doug Weller talk 08:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Ordovician–Silurian extinction events

I see that you added a sentence to Ordovician–Silurian extinction events § Gamma ray burst hypothesis:

It is also the case that gamma rays would have caused genetic mutations that should have caused a rapid increase in the number of new species on earth after the extinction event.

I've tagged it "citation needed". As you know by now, all content has to be reliably sourced. Yes, I took biology in high school, and I know in general about the connection between radiation and mutation, but "I know that" is not a reliable source.

You can {{ping}} me if you want to discuss this. Regards, --Thnidu (talk) 04:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

More original research at Ness of Brodgar and Basking shark - blocking time?

You've had several warnings about this and ignored them. I'm not convinced that you are competent enough to edit here. Can you convince me that you are? Doug Weller talk 15:50, 23 May 2017 (UTC)