User talk:Sonphan1

Welcome!

Hello, Sonphan1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Son Hoang, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Lithorien (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Son Hoang

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Son Hoang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Lithorien (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of One Fish, Two Fish, Three, Four, Five Fish!

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on One Fish, Two Fish, Three, Four, Five Fish! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pink Bull 17:21, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of One Fish, Two Fish, Three, Four, Five Fish!

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on One Fish, Two Fish, Three, Four, Five Fish!, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lithorien (talk) 17:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Mozart

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Thomas Mozart, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Irn (talk) 17:42, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to René Descartes, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not quite sure what you're trying to do, but creating inappropriate pages and inserting inappropriate images in articles is disruptive - you might just be testing things, but other people are trying to use the encyclopedia seriously. If you wish to do any tests, please use the Sandbox, or feel free to create your own, say at User:Sonphan1/Sandbox. But please, no more test edits on live articles. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of House Of Vienna

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on House Of Vienna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NTox | talk 22:43, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Vandalism

Please desist from the various vandal activity that you appear to have practising. Not big, not clever. Brendandh (talk) 23:05, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And this edit of yours is both inaccurate and very odd – hope that's not a WP:SOCK account! . . . dave souza, talk 23:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have to agree with Dave souza's comment here. Your accusation at User talk:Peperoque that that user is a blocked vandal was unacceptable. I am assuming good faith and here and thinking that you are still just testing and finding your way around, but as I have already told you before, testing on live articles and on other user's pages is not acceptable. Carry out your tests at WP:Sandbox, or in your own user pages, but nowhere else, please. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:51, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and please have a proper read of Wikipedia:Starting an article before you try to create any more new articles -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Johannes Kepler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Johannes Kepler was changed by Sonphan1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920342 on 2012-02-21T14:52:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "And to Think That I Saw It on MULBERRY STREET A Book"

A page you created, And to Think That I Saw It on MULBERRY STREET A Book, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. DVdm (talk) 14:58, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but almost everything you have been doing here so far has been disruptive, and you really don't seem to be able to understand how to edit or create articles here at all. And you are ignoring all attempts to communicate with you. It may be that English is not your native language, and we have many editors here like that. But if your English is not good enough for you to understand what people are saying to you, or to understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, then it may not be possible for you to contribute here.
What you need to do now is respond here, explain what you are trying to do, and tell us whether or not you understand any of the messages people have left for you here on this Talk page. Once we get some communication from you, someone might be able to help you - but if you repeatedly fail to respond to us, there's really no help we can give you.
-- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:12, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He is not blocked and unblock him and he is an administrator and he can edit everything in wikipedia. Please unblock User:Sonphan1 on Wikipedia. I don't make mistakes. Here. This User is an Administrator and it is a user that did not make any mistakes. (Added unsigned by Sonphan1)

While blocked, you must not remove the block notice. Also, your comments above (which I have just restored after reverting your removal of the block notice), are blatantly false - you are not an administrator, you can not edit everything in Wikipedia, and you most certainly did make mistakes. While blocked, you may only use this page to discuss your block and work towards unblock, by addressing the things you were doing wrong. If you continue to remove block notices, and make false statements like the above, you are likely to lose Talk page access.

What you need to do is follow the instructions in the block notice, read the guide to appealing blocks, and then post a proper unblock request as instructed, showing that you understand what you did wrong and explaining how you will avoid future problems. If you cannot at least do that, you will not be unblocked. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Socking

I have just blocked your sockpuppet User:SonphanBot100 -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:03, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access

I have revoked your Talk page access for repeatedly abusing its purpose while blocked. If you wish to appeal your block now, please see WP:BASC -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]