User talk:Sonic The Lombax

Disney

Before you go back and edit the page again, please use the talk page to DISCUSS the matter. This is in line with the WP:BRD and WP:FAOWN guidelines about edit warring and dealing with edits on FAs. - SchroCat (talk) 17:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to use the talk page before you edit the Disney artiucle again. - SchroCat (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the talk page? Sonic The Lombax (talk) 18:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it will do for now, yes. - SchroCat (talk) 19:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had problems editing the article because I'm using the phone and when I leave Wikipedia to go to another site and the source, well all I wrote on Wikipedia, including the citation links, disappears, that's why I had to edit the article many times, and it was very annoying and frustrating. Now I copied everything I wanted to put. It was a hard work but I finally made it. Now I have to ask the permission to reintroduce the text? Sonic The Lombax (talk) 19:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons it was removed are: 1. the sources you have used are not WP:RELIABLE; and 2. the writing was not was not up to the standard expected on a Featured Article. Featured articles are always more closely watched than other articles as they have been through two intensive review processes. See WP:FAOWN for further details on this. - SchroCat (talk) 19:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But there were also citation links. How couldn't be reliable? Sonic The Lombax (talk) 20:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's the standard of the references you've added. Blogs are not allowed - see WP:BLOGS. - SchroCat (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs by Disney employees, former employees, historian, critics and writer are not allowed? Sonic The Lombax (talk) 20:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

writers Sonic The Lombax (talk) 20:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. There is a huge amount of much more reliable information from solid sources - including academic works - that trump all these. - SchroCat (talk) 20:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show me some example of what was "inappropriate"? Sonic The Lombax (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Korkis, well-known Disney and animation historian who intervied many Disney personalities in his life and career isn't reliable? The anti-Nazis cartoons and the employment of the Sherman Brothers are false? Sonic The Lombax (talk) 21:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As there is so much information about Disney in such a large number of sources (including academic works), then there is no need to use blogs. They just can't be used. This is all without looking at what the information is that's being added. This is the article about the man, not about the work, or the company, so make sure you're actually dealing with something that is core to individual. - SchroCat (talk) 21:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just the Floyd Norman blog was the problem? Sonic The Lombax (talk) 21:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. As I've said above, the writing was not was not up to the standard expected on a Featured Article. Other parts of the added information were unsourced and were not about Disney the man, but about the output of the studio. There were several issues that were problematic. - SchroCat (talk) 21:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think I get it. But the statement of Nick Stewart in 1989 was referred to Walt. And I still don't understand why Disney's anti-Nazis cartoons would be inappropriate. Sonic The Lombax (talk) 22:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The 1989 statement is questionable as to whether it's the company or the man that is being referred to, and the source is dubious. The cartoons are unsourced and more about the company's output, rather than about the man. And please don't ever change the language used in direct quotes without seeing the source referred to: you chaned the quote from Gabler away from the original to something he did not say. - SchroCat (talk) 22:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I DID SO? I translated it from another Wiki. How stupid am I! Sonic The Lombax (talk) 22:34, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's why you need to see the original. - SchroCat (talk) 22:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A video of Der Fhuehrer's Face historically introduced by Leonard Maltin can be considered a reliable source? Sonic The Lombax (talk) 22:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The information doesn't belong in this article. - SchroCat (talk) 22:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NO? The most famous anti-Nazi Walt's produced? Sonic The Lombax (talk) 23:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

anti-Nazis CARTOON Walt's produced? Sonic The Lombax (talk) 23:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We already cover the basics of this information in the article. You need to actually read it first, not just turn up and shovel badly written, poorly sourced information into the wrong sections of the article, - SchroCat (talk) 23:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Honest Yusuf Cricket (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cabayi (talk) 09:29, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet? What does it mean? Sonic The Lombax (talk) 13:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]