User talk:Sonic100

Dogille

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Dogille, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Slgr a n d s o n (page - messages - contribs) 17:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this because it has a stupid name? {Sonic100 17:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

It appears to be fake, as do most of your other contributions. Please do not add false information to Wikipedia, as it is considered vandalism. —tregoweth (talk) 17:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

None of the films you created articles for appear to be real. If you can provide some evidence that the films are in production, let me know, and I'll restore the articles. —tregoweth (talk) 17:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well they were in the Upcoming films article, they had future films on them and they were in the List of animated feature films, so they you are. {Sonic100 17:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

He's right they just aven't been in Google yet. {172.207.88.87 17:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

They you are thank you, {User:172.207.88.87. {Sonic100 18:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

Adding comments from sockpuppets won't help. If you continue to add false information to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —tregoweth (talk) 18:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT!

That guy is not a sockpuppet you fiend! {Sonic100 18:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

And that The Freedom Life page you deleted that wasn't my page. {Sonic100 18:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

Let's see: Davie400 and Sonic100 have similar names, edit similar articles in similar styles, create similar fake articles, and use a left curly bracket in their signatures, and made comments on each others' talk pages to conversations that they weren't originally part of. —tregoweth (talk) 18:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what your talking about this Davie400 wo is he and why does he create simliar articles like me, you've got it all mixed up pal. {Sonic100 18:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

Whatever; just stop creating articles for things you just made up, and we'll be fine. —tregoweth (talk) 18:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't whatever me, these articles were real and you deleted them I am not out of here until those articles are back now. {Sonic100 18:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

Who is FiveGuys300, and why are they posting as you? —tregoweth (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nobodies posting as me ya prick! {Sonic100 18:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. —tregoweth (talk) 19:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block me for nothing eh? What are you on about?

Ah is it because I called you a prick right? Well I'm sorry, your not a prick your cool best user of all, I'm just sorry. Please unblock me and me and my friends will stop adding hoaxes to Wikipedia, please I'm begging you, please.{Sonic100 19:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

we will never ever add hoaxes again

Request handled by: Sonic100 19:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, well, when the block expires in twenty-some hours, and you behave properly (no personal attacks, no false information), there shouldn't be any more problems. —tregoweth (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait are you a grown-up? {Sonic100 19:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

An administrator grown-up. —tregoweth (talk) 19:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm 12 years old. {Sonic100 19:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

Well, that's no excuse for violating wikipedia rules. —tregoweth (talk) 19:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look I'm sorry and I want to be unblocked now, please. {Sonic100 19:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

Give me one more chance please please I'm begging you. {Sonic100 18:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

Okay, but only because your block expires soon anyway. —tregoweth (talk) 18:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should be unblocked now. Remember to behave; if you have any questions feel free to ask me. —tregoweth (talk) 18:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]