User talk:Soneryd

Welcome!

Hello, Soneryd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 11:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ali Kepenek

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ali Kepenek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 11:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chris Succo

Hello, Soneryd. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Chris Succo, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sarah Oppenheimer

Hello, Soneryd. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sarah Oppenheimer, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:48, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Succo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Succo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Succo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sarah Oppenheimer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Oppenheimer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Oppenheimer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:54, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Evan Gruzis

Hello, Soneryd. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Evan Gruzis, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:56, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DUVE Berlin

Hello Soneryd,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged DUVE Berlin for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:58, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

Thank you for your contributions. It appears that with your knowledge of the DUVE Gallerie Berlin and it exhibiting artists, and the series of articles you have created, that you may possibly be connected with the gallery. If this is so, please take a moment to read our policy at WP:COI very carefully. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Evan Gruzis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evan Gruzis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Gruzis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have retracted the AfD and in my capacity as admin, closed it as 'keep'. It's as well to bear in mind however, that the onus is on the article creator to provide sufficient quality references to assert notability and not to rely wholly on the Wikipedia community to complete the work - especially if such sources are relatively easy to find. I apologise if my concerns of COI were unfounded, and I hope you will continue to contribute articles on the art world. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Soneryd, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Soneryd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]