User talk:SonalMehta06

SonalMehta06, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SonalMehta06! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Write Here

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

TrangaBellam (talk) 06:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove "Indian right-wing" from lead? TrangaBellam (talk) 06:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TrangaBellam: it violates WP:CRIT and WP:UNDUE. and why did you reverted everything, if you have issue with one edit you should revert that, rest of my edits was just name corrections, i am reverting them and adding "Indian Right wing" as per your will until our discussion is going on here. SonalMehta06 (talk) 06:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TrangaBellam: i have reverted your edit but not all, i have added "Indian right wing". please continue this discussion on page's talk page. not here. SonalMehta06 (talk) 07:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 07:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 07:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Republic World, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 12:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In particular, this edit of yours is marked as minor and has an edit summary "name change" but removes a whole host of citations. That can mislead editors into thinking the edit is an innocuous one. Please be careful with both the use of the minor edit tag as well as with your edit summaries. --RegentsPark (comment) 12:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent move

Hi. I reverted your move from Amarnath Mandir to AmarnathJi Mandir because it was contested (on my talk page). If you think your title is the correct one, you'll need to go through the WP:RM#CM process. --RegentsPark (comment) 12:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I messed up the moves and the original article was at Amarnath Temple. --RegentsPark (comment) 12:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]