User talk:Somerby

redirect discussion

Redirect targets are discussed at WP:RFD. You should open a discuss there so it will be seen by knowledgeable editors. MB 15:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification and explanation. I'll do it as you said. --Somerby (talk) 15:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

Hi Somerby! Thank you for your edits to Danish Realm. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Kingdom of the Netherlands into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 18:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Hi Somerby, I took a look at your edits and you seem to be a pretty sensible and correct editor despite being new, which is not seen too often. Thus, I wanted to give you this as to motivate you to stay on the project. Keep the work up. Super Ψ Dro 19:33, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In case you don't know what is this, read WP:BARNSTAR. They are basically "prizes" that are given in Wikipedia. Super Ψ Dro 19:33, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you a lot! --Somerby (talk) 09:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Enlightened absolutism into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. eviolite (talk) 12:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Absolutism (European history)

Hello Somerby! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Absolutism (European history), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from markalburgermusichistory.blogspot.com/2008/06/jean-baptiste-lully-1632-1687.html), and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Absolutism (European history) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Absolutism (European history), in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Absolutism (European history). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Absolutism (European history) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Absolutism (European history) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! JW 1961^Talk 10:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Joseywales1961, It was in wikipedia long before it was published on markalburgermusichistory.blogspot.com, please see page history. --Somerby (talk) 11:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored, thanks for the explanation JW 1961^Talk 14:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jamaica Independence Act 1962

Hello, Somerby,

Thank you for creating Jamaica Independence Act 1962.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Can you please check the London Gazette (reference 5) as it mentions Barbados Independence Act rather than Jamaica. Thank you for the article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961^Talk 18:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseywales1961: thank you, I corrected the reference and put a right one. Somerby (talk) 21:03, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great and thank you for that - have a good evening JW 1961^Talk 21:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of Grenada

As you indicated your reason for nominating Kingdom of Grenada was to challenge the closure of the previous discussion, I have procedurally closed the nomination and started a Wikipedia:Deletion review on your behalf, see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 November 17#Kingdom of Grenada. Thryduulf (talk) 09:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I still did not know so well how wikibureaucracy works :) --Somerby (talk) 10:17, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Lagelander per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lagelander. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Realm of Britain" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Realm of Britain and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 10#Realm of Britain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Balkovec (talk) 15:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]