User talk:SomeWikiuser999
Welcome!
[edit]
|
April 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm Fox Wilson. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Star Trek Into Darkness— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fox Wilson (talk) 02:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Vandal watchlist (April 29)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vandal watchlist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! SomeWikiuser999,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! joe deckertalk 01:14, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
|
April 2017
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to User:Apteva/sandbox, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not edit other user pages without a good reason. It is often frowned upon or irritating, and should generally be avoided. Your edit to this other user's personal sandbox could be considered to be disruptive editing. Murph9000 (talk) 04:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Its a trout!
[edit]Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
That was my WikiProject
[edit]The thing you reverted on AIV was my Wikiproject, and I deleted it a few days ago due to it being so colosely related to the CVU. Can I revert it back?-barrelroll.dev (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Sorry
[edit]Yeah, sure, go ahead and derevert it.
- Ha, It was alredy reverted when I got there-barrelroll.dev (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Smash!
You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- ===Really?===
- Sinebot, you know I signed my talk page post afterward! Why did you warn me on my talkpage?
THE END
[edit]Right! Stop that! It's far too silly! Don't take this too seriously. Another user just wants you to know something you said crosses their boundaries of sensibility. |
May 2017
[edit]Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Wikipedia:Escalating alphabeticals.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Stop messing around. Now. NeilN talk to me 19:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)