User talk:SomeGuy1122

--

In response to your feedback

Would you please elaborate your comment. Are you implying whole Wikipedia is biased?

— Bill william compton^Talk 11:51, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POV campaign against Iran articles

Please get involved whenever you have time to spare. See: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Iran - Vandalism against Iran articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by اردیبهشت (talk • contribs) 18:16, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian Space Agency

Hello. I could use your input over at the Iranian Space Agency article. I tried making a compromise, but I am dealing with a real "bully" of an editor. I would like your input on it. The Scythian 21:25, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to Talk:Cyrus Cylinder. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. this refers to your attack on Saddhiyama Dougweller (talk) 12:30, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Cyrus Cylinder, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. Calling Lendering a liar and a manipulator, even on a talk page, is a WP:BLP violation and I've removed it. Dougweller (talk) 12:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Sibel Edmonds, you may be blocked from editing. Here you actually changed a quotation that read “But as a naturalized Turkish-American, she saw the job as her patriotic duty.” to read “But as a naturalized Iranian-American, she saw the job as her patriotic duty.” You also replaced Turkic with Iranian throughout the article. This is also a violation of WP:BLP Dougweller (talk) 14:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from fabricating any "personal attacks" on my part. My post was a response to the attack of the editor Prioryman, on Talk:Cyrus Cylinder. SomeGuy1122 (talk) 14:11, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was a personal attack against a specific editor. Your language concerning Lendering was a BLP violation. Dougweller (talk) 14:22, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lendering is not an editor on Wikipedia as far as I can see, at least not with that name, unless you have personal contacts with him when you edited and put biased material on the Cyrus pages. Furthermore, my post was a response to the insults of Prioryman. If you're so concerned with what people call each other, feel free to give him the same speech for his provoking post which prompted an answer from me. SomeGuy1122 (talk) 14:30, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You called Lendering a liar and a manipulator, which is a WP:BLP violation - BLP applies on talk pages as well as in articles. I have never had any contact with him and as you know removed him as a source today from several parts of the article. I see now that it was Prioryman that you were calling a liar, not Saddhiyama, but that's still a personal attack. Dougweller (talk) 14:59, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Calling my corrections of the nationality of Sibel Edmonds "vandalism", does not make it so. Her father is in fact an Iranian and she has mentioned her childhood in Iran many times in her interviews and the fact that she was born in Iran. SomeGuy1122 (talk) 14:13, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalism is the changing of a quotation. If you want to change her nationality then I suggest you discuss it on the talk page. Dougweller (talk) 14:22, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since when does one have to put a request for edit on the talk page before editing in Wikipedia? I did not change her nationality, I corrected it. Keep calling vandalism does not make it so. SomeGuy1122 (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, by fishing through my few edits on Wikipedia and calling them vandalism does not change the reality of the matter, which is the fact that you and Prioryman and maybe even Jona Lendering himself have been systematically changing many Iranian-related articles, in particular the Cyrus articles, to suit your own POV, and you've been using your administrator powers to help make it so, I do not need to tell you that that's of course against Wikipedia code of conduct and beyond. SomeGuy1122 (talk) 14:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You changed a quotation. That's the bottom line. I haven't used my Admin powers, and I don't have a pro or anti-Iranian pov, just a pro-reliable sources and NPOV pov. You are just one of a number of editors who want to remove well-sourced material by well known historians from the articles related to Cyrus. Dougweller (talk) 14:59, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again, even "quotations" have to be sourced and true, removing one that isn't true or relevant to a particular article is not vandalism.And yes you have used your admin powers to suit your own POV and agenda over the Cyrus articles and many other Iranian-related articles it seems, all there evident in the history of Cyrus Cylinder. All your sources were unreliable and biased, some of which you seem to have removed just minutes ago. SomeGuy1122 (talk) 15:10, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Baharlu (ethnic group)

This is another example where you changed Turkic to Iranian. I've noted that you reject sources that disagree with you, but you will find that we consider the Encyclopædia Iranica a reliable source. If you continue to make unsourced changes like this you are likely to be blocked. Dougweller (talk) 14:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop trying to intimidate me, and calling me a vandalizer for editing in Wikipedia. Yes Encyclopedia Iranica is a reliable source, no argue with that. Telling me that "I've noted that you reject sources that disagree with you" is ad hominem and your opinion. You are a major editor of the Cyrus Cylinder article which I commented on, and your behavior on it, which is clearly why you have decided to fill my user talk page just hours after. Furthermore I see you have been busy editing the Iranian-related articles with unsourced material just as you've done on the Cyrus Cylinder article. I won't go as far as you did to quote and link Wikipedia rules regarding these facts, because that would be a waste of my time. You also clearly have taken sides with Prioryman when editing Cyrus Cylinder and seem to have taken advantage of your administrator powers to shape the article and put unsourced and biased material which smears the name of Cyrus the great with fabricated lies. If you continue on doing this and harassing me I will report all of this to the administration board.SomeGuy1122 (talk) 14:28, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've called your changing a quotation vandalism. I don't know what else to call it. Perhaps the comment on your opinion of sources went to far. Your BLP violation and your other comments brought your edits to my attention. You do seem to have a pattern of changing Turkic to Iranian. If I've added unsourced material that's unusual - I'm pretty good at sourcing material. What have I added at Cyrus Cylinder that isn't sourced? If I actually have added unsourced material there that might be contentious or challenged I'll try to source or remove it. Just as I removed Lendering today. I'm not harassing you, I'm letting you know about problems with your edits. Surely you agree that you could have checked Baharlu before changing it, and I doubt that you want to justify changing a quotation. It's simply a fact that if you go through articles changing nationalities without sourcing them sooner or later you are likely to be blocked. I'd prefer that this didn't happen (both unsourced changes and a possible block). I wouldn't block you myself. The fact that I agree with another editor most of the time on this article proves what? And I have never "put unsourced and biased material which smears the name of Cyrus the great with fabricated lies." If you think I have, put your money where your mouth is and show where I've done this (at the talk page, not here or my talk page). Dougweller (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You keep repeating the same accusations. Even quotations have to be sourced and have to be true. You also keep clinging on to the very few edits I've made to Wikipedia and amusingly calling them vandalism. All to distort the matter and fact which why this all started: You and Prioryman, and Jona Lendering apparently have been doing the vandalizing as you call it, not me. You've put very very biased material against Cyrus the great and his cylinder without a single shred of evidence to backup your claims. Jona Lendering's website Livius.org seem to be the major "source" you've put to back up your claims, which is of course not considered as a reliable source according to the Wikipedia rules. And you have as I mentioned before, used your administrator power to make your edits stick and reverted anyone who disagreed with your outrages edits of the articles in mention. You're still trying to harass and intimate me by calling my few edits vandalism, and filling my talk page with warnings, because of the fact that I commented and responded to you and the other editors I mentioned on Talk:Cyrus Cylinder. As I mentioned in that page, I hope someone who actually edits in Wikipedia takes this to the highest authorities of Wikipedia to show what you and the others mentioned have been doing all along, but if you continue to harass me, that person will be me. Lastly this is my final response to you regarding this. SomeGuy1122 (talk) 14:53, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Only account?

I wonder, considering you are an editor with only 50 edits to your name, you seem awfully fixated on particular editors as well as relatively experienced when it comes to some of the more intricate ways that Wikipedia works (unfortunately it doesn't seem to include WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:Verifiability). Have you had any other accounts here on Wikipedia? --Saddhiyama (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You should be asking yourself that question. Since you, Dougweller, and Prioryman, all at the same time came to defend the utter vandalism that you've been doing on the Cyrus cylinder entry. Disregarding the other links you put on my page which of course you also have broken on top of the outrages vandalism you have done on the Cyrus pages: WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:Verifiability. SomeGuy1122 (talk) 18:07, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

You have been reported here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Since you didn't heed my warning I gave you the other day [1], about retracting your spurious accusations of "lying", but instead chose to reopen the same issue with the same spurious accusations again today [2], I have blocked you for 48 hours, for tendentious editing, personal attacks and a general display of an aggressive and persistent refusal to get the point during the talk page discussion. Your accusation of lying is utterly groundless: Contrary to what you claim, Kansas Bear obviously did repeatedly confirm that he had himself originally brought forward that source [3]. The issue is not who first cited it; the issue is that you have stubbornly been using it for supporting a claim other than what it says. Multiple people on the talkpage have tried to explain to you that you cannot simply extrapolate from a statement that describes a victory in a battle to a statement that describes the outcome of the entire war two years later; you have persistently refused to listen. You will need to change your attitude to editing and to cooperating with other editors here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:59, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

lol, it was pretty much the sad response I was expecting and even said so in my report: [4]. Every single claim you have put here in your post is simply a lie and your own version of things. You're fabricating things to fool whom exactly? Everything I said can be seen in the report that you have hid in the administrator's noticeboard: [5]. Pointing out your abuse in that report instead of responding to the proof i laid out that proved Kansas Bear falsified the entire report. Your claims that Kansas Bear once mentioned that it was his own source is what's groundless and simply a lie. I proved in my report that he indeed had lied about it all, not once mentioned it was his own source, so if anyone but yourself wonder about that, they can see the report for themselves. The only aggressive behavior is that of yours and Kansas Bear, you have used your administrative powers to bait me into a response instead of even responding to my post which proved Kansas Bear had lied. And now you come here and claim my post ever got a response. He did never mention once in the REPORT he made in administrators noticeboard that it was his own source, so you lying about that he did so repeatedly makes me laugh. The links are all in my report above for anyone to see, nothing you can lie about here other than hide the facts which you did by hiding the report and classifying it as closed.

What you now did here again is baiting, you are simply fabricating things just like Kansas Bear did to make me look like the aggressor. What people on the talk page? Two of them were called by Kansas Bear himself, one of them being a Turkish user with pro-Ottoman Turkish sentiments, as I showed in my report.

Nice to see you hide that report to hide the fact of your misbehavior and abuse instead of dealing with the real issue of the report, which was the falsification and disinformation of Kansas Bear and his personal attacks vs. me in the talk page of Ottoman Persian wars.

I know you have a history of anti-Persian sentiments and bigotry in Wikipedia and have gotten away with it every time, just as you have now,. But don't worry I will show what you have done here to neutral administrators before leaving. Of course won't bother going on with this charade and request an unblock since I know how easily pathetically bigoted administrators such as yourself get away with just about anything in here. So why don't you go fuck yourself you hateful racist piece of shit. Now why don't you add that to your fabricated list of personal attacks and aggressive behavior you son of a whore ;) SomeGuy1122 (talk) 21:55, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

This [6] did not help your case. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]