User talk:Solutions 2015

Deceptive editing

None of your edits were minor, and the links weren't all dead. Don't add just any links. See WP:ELNO. -- Brangifer (talk) 08:22, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing requires some explanation. Feel free to explain here. Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Solutions 2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account has been blocked indefinitely for this reason "None of your edits were minor, and the links weren't all dead. Don't add just any links." My account is not a spammer, my edits are minor and all the links that I have changed are dead links. I checked the dead links first before I add a working link.

Decline reason:

On further investigation, I find too many reasons to suggest that this in in fact a Matthew Woodward-inspired SEO campaign. Yunshui ^雲 _水 21:46, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you please explain what was wrong with the links that you used as replacements? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:35, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]