User talk:Solon5g93

Blue-footed Booby referencing

Thanks for tracking down the details of the references in that article! However, I explicitly mentioned in an edit-summary why having DOI (especially) but also JSTOR is a good idea. You've now twice removed it for no apparent reason. These database tokens are an extremely standard way of finding electronic resources...means one doesn't have to look up anything in any index or database, or search/navigate through a table of contents of an issue. If you think these tokens are useless, you might want to start a more general discussion about it at Template talk:Citation. DMacks (talk) 19:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Large Blue

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Large Blue you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 07:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Euphydryas chalcedona pupa.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Euphydryas chalcedona pupa.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Large Blue

The article Large Blue you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Large Blue for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 17:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Archips cerasivorana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Signum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]