User talk:Solomonyuu

DO NOT COPY

DO NOT COPY is a basic concept in academia. The content you added at Vijay (actor) in this edit was copied from other sources.[1][2] This is unacceptable. Copying is intellectually dishonest and lazy, and constitutes intellectual theft. Plagiarism and copyright violations will not be tolerated at Wikipedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:15, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable awards

Re: this edit, there are so many awards out there in the world, many of them are fly-by-night companies that just want to make a quick buck, and/or they are part of a marketing scheme to inflate the importance of films and actors. We only care about notable awards from established awards bodies. Our basic requirement for such an award, like the International Achievement Recognition Awards you added to the Vijay article, is that the award should already have a Wikipedia article, and that article should have endured community judgments about its notability. The International Achievement Recognition Award has no article at Wikipedia, thus, we can't assume that it's a known, reputable, established awards entity. The content has been removed. Also, the next time you add content about something, please be sure you are using proper English syntax and structure. It's not other editors' job to fix problems with your English. You failed to capitalise proper nouns, which is a fairly basic mistake to make. Competence is required at Wikipedia. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:31, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use blogs as references

Hi there, re: this, please do not use blogs like moviecrow.com as references. Anybody can start a blog or a website and publish whatever they want. We're only interested in what mainstream reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything. Please stick to major news sites and things of that nature. See WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources for a general list of good and bad references to use in the context of Indian entertainment. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:06, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits at Vijay - Insufficient referencing and potential copyright violations

Hi there, re: these edits, you are attempting to express an opinion about how Vijay won worldwide fame, but your opinions are not attributed to reliable sources. We don't care what editors think or what personal analyses editors have performed. All of this is considered original research. Any attempt to summarise an opinion must be directly attributed to the reliable source who thinks that. Also, we do not use random YouTube videos as references, since they could potentially be copyright violations. If someone reposts a song or a video, or a movie without express permission to do so, that is almost certainly a copyright violation. Only if a YouTube channel is verified and hosting content they own (for example if the Colors TV channel hosted an interview that was made by Colors TV) then we could potentially use that. But linking to songs is just going to look like an attempt to promote songs, so you should avoid that as well. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:07, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

can i add these source instead of the youtube links.

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/entertainment/kollywood/160416/when-in-romania-go-crazy-over-selfie-pulla.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Solomonyuu (talk • contribs) 16:24, August 14, 2018 (UTC)

OK, first, please start signing your posts with four tildes like: ~~~~. This is important, as it will append your name and the time/date you commented. This is necessary so that everybody knows who says what, and when it was said. As for these changes, since you've been reverted by another editor, you will now need to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for the content you are interested in adding. One thing that stands out based on the references and narrative you provided, is that there is a possibility that Vijay's song won attention in Romania due to the fact that "pulla" could be Romanian slang for "penis". Yet, you kind of neglected to point that out, and it's unclear if it won widespread appeal because of the penis connection. I think you should address that issue when you argue for inclusion, because that might actually be an embarrassing reason why Vijay was popular in Romania. You might want to think about that. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:48, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Drooling

Your edit here is ridiculous. There's no such thing as "universal" anything. It's a hyperbolic word that only exists to exaggerate statements. "Universal acceptance" means that nobody dislikes the person. Again, ridiculous. I'm sure there are hundreds of thousands of people who don't like Vijay's work. "Universal acclaim" implies that nobody had a dissenting opinion about a subject. Completely absurd. There must be something somebody doesn't like about the film/book/etc. Please don't use hyperbolic phrasing like this in the future. We are a neutral encyclopedia, not a fansite that drools over article subjects. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Garbage references

Last warning: stop adding garbage references like this and this. The fact that a website exists doesn't mean that it is suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Anybody can start a blog or website or whatever and publish whatever the hell they want. We only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything. That means mainstream news sites, not sites that nobody's ever heard of. Quickly familiarise yourself with WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources.

Also, have you ever edited at Wikipedia under another user name, and are you evading a previous block? And, are you a paid editor? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for wikipedia reliable sources

iam a srilankan by birth first time editing in wikipedia so i made grammatical errors and other unreliable references feel free to help me

before adding anything i will get your opinion cypherbomb

Stop trying to promote Vijay and other actors at Wikipedia

Re: these changes, it's pretty clear that you don't really understand the content you're copying and pasting into the Vijay (actor) article, because if you did, you wouldn't be copy/pasting into the article. I don't have time to teach you what's wrong with most of these sorts of edits, but you simply cannot copy content from other sources, even reliable ones. If you can't write in English in your own voice, then you shouldn't be editing here. "Sold in black" is a colloquialism that is not globally understood. Obviously you did not know that, so you copied the phrasing from the source. You also copied the phrasing "Inspite of the huge competition", which anybody familiar with normal editing rules would have avoided because 1) It is puffery and 2) It is poor grammar and 3) plagiarism. Stop copying from other sources. You've been warned about this already. Find more objective ways to describe Vijay and the other subjects you edit. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:01, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK got it thanks for making me understand what's wrong with my editing will avoid puffery words from reliable sources Solomonyuu (talk) 01:10, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More vague puffery

In your haste to add more heaping praise onto Vijay, your recent edits made a gloriously inaccurate claim. Vijay's films are not "listed under all-time top-grossing films in UK" as you claim. Unless you mean 161st place for Mersal. Or 205th place for Thuppakki? Or 169th place for Theri? Or 187th place for Kaththi? When you copy content without thinking, you can wind up making grandiose claims that are totally inaccurate. At best, the source you cited would indicate that his films are among the highest-grossing Tamil films in the UK, but that's not what you said at all, and the result is major exaggeration that only serves to promote the subject. Competence is required at Wikipedia. Editors need to employ critical thinking and reading comprehension skills and have a proficient understanding of English to work here successfully. If you don't understand what a reference is trying to say, then you cannot adequately communicate that information. I strongly recommend that you edit at a Wikipedia in your native tongue until your English skills are sufficient to allow you to write at a professional level. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:03, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your comment here, it would seem to me, based on that statement, that you lack the proper objectivity to edit articles about Vijay. If you are unable to provide a balanced perspective about the subject, which would include criticism levied against him, then you seem incapable of editing from a neutral perspective. Also, please don't continue these discussions on my talk page. Your talk page seems like the appropriate place to discuss the various matters I've brought to your attention. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:11, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:IARA Awards UK

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:IARA Awards UK requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://iara-awards.org/news/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:09, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Copyright violations, advertising/promotion, suspected sockpuppetry.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:16, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]