User talk:Solhjoo

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Solhjoo. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 06:09, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

.

NPOV

That was your welcome. Now for something that may not be so welcome. I'd like you to read WP:NPOV. You seem to have an edit pattern of removing information that is Kurdish or pro-Kurdish. A lot, perhaps most, of your edits are being reverted by more than one editor. When you are editing an article and more than one person reverts you, then you should think about getting a WP:Consensus for your edit on the article's talk page. I'm a bit surprised you haven't had any talk page warnings yet. If you do, make sure you take them seriously please so that you avoid being blocked. Dougweller (talk) 15:29, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Solhjoo, as i saw, you just try to change articles which related to Kurds. Articles are not your blogs. You cant change them as you want. User:Dougweller has already warned you. You cant just impose your ideas to all people. Many users have reverted your edits but you dont stop. If you want to improve wikipedia, please stop to change article in the way as you know the best. Thanks.--Meymano (talk) 14:01, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Your addition to Kurdish people has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. copyvio from source and link to copyvio document - and no attribution Dougweller (talk) 04:50, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tip - never use anything from Google Documents or Scribd. They both host a lot of copyvio. Dougweller (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Mahabad

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Mahabad without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 22:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Winner 42. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kurdistan with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:07, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not move pages without consensus

Please stop moving pages to pro-Kurdish names without gaining consensus for your changes. Page moves can be very disruptive, and when done wrong, can require an administrator to fix. If you continue moving pages in a disruptive manner you may be blocked from editing. —Darkwind (talk) 20:31, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Continued disruptive editing on Kurdish topics

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You've continued your campaign of pro-Kurdish move warring since the advice given you on 23 June by User:Darkwind. When I review your article edits, it seems that your changes are constantly being undone by others. I can't verify that you've ever made a useful improvement to a Wikipedia article. Any admin may lift this block if they become convinced you will follow Wikipedia policy in the future. EdJohnston (talk) 20:34, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have evaded your block by using sockpuppet accounts, and have used them to continue your disruptive editing and your promoting of a nationalistic point of view, the block is now indefinite.

The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:49, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]