User talk:Solaris68

Could you cite the actual cases, please. On Barrett. I'd suggest that if you are writing about two thrown out, that you also see if you can add a total of cases, and possible whether anyone has had a case against Quackwatch thrown out. If th ecasesa re against Barrett personally they should be on that page, if against Quackwatch perhaps they belong there? Midgley 23:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you rather writing the same thing into several articles? It mght be more economical to put it in one, and make a brief note in the others, if they are relevant there. I see you have a particualr interest in this subject. Midgley 23:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome! I did cite the actual cases (see links). Barrett was involced in both cases; he was a plaintiff in the 2001 case and testified for (and was a director of) NCAHF in the second. Coverage of all this is more extensive in NCAHF but repeating essentials, with a Wikilink, seems appropriate. Also please see WP:LEAD. Solaris68 01:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And Welcome...

Welcome!

Hello, Solaris68, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Midgley 23:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]