User talk:Soko maya

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bi-Han

The article Bi-Han has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created article from an in-universe perspective (mixes information from Sub-Zero (Mortal Kombat) and Noob Saibot).

Name not the one the character is most well-known by (again, that would be Sub-Zero or Noob Saibot) Insufficient information to merit a separate article (information is already present in the aforementioned articles. Created despite having been discouraged from doing so [[1]].

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. uKER (talk) 02:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Destiny Martin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Destiny Martin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Acroterion _(talk) 03:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Noob saibot red (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. J Greb (talk) 03:29, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soko maya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will admit I know who Noob saibot red is. He told me that he is no longer using Wikipedia. He told me to use it now. It's kinda like I'm carrying his legacy. Oh, but I won't make the same mistake he did. Trust me. I haven't vandalized Wikipedia at all. And I'm trying to help but if you think I'm him, just like my neighbors do, maybe right now isn't the best time. So I think I should leave for now. By the way, remember, he's gone, forever. He told me so. So I will leave till the time's right. When is the right time anyway?

Decline reason:

The right time is when you learn the difference between truth and lies. Several years at least, it would appear. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 04:20, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"Carrying on the legacy" of a blocked user is what we call WP:Meat puppetry. - Vianello (Talk) 04:20, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soko maya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Oh. Well he was a bad kid in school. That Justin seriously. Even if it's meat pupetry, what ever he did I won'tofo, I promise. Just for you to trust me. If there is nothing I can do, then I'll leave. But I still want to know what can I do? And what can you do? I'm more mature. He used to beat me. I became friends with him so he wouldn't beat me anymore. Please, you don't know how hard my life is. So please think from your heart. I just ask, but if you think I'm taking advantage of you just tell me what I can do to separate me from this kid that put me into a bad place? If you can do nothing, I will leave for a few years until I am older. As he did no need to revoke my talk page editing privileges, when I say I leave, I leave. I'm honest and don't lie.

Decline reason:

No valid or convincing reason given to unblock. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:27, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh, and another thing this is a proxy server we are on, so if others with the same IP address are on Wikipedia they're not us. Justin is not on Wikipedia anymore, but I'm going to tell you something you need to keep a secret, if he knows, it's the end of me. Justin is no longer on Wikipedia but now on your mirror website Uncyclopedia that makes fun of Wikipedia and everything on Wikipedia, so do not tell him, please. If that effects something here.

That is irrelevant. People can edit on Uncyclopedia, Encyclopedia Dramatica, or whatever other websites they want - it's no harm to their status on Wikipedia. No worries there. In fact, it probably helps some folks vent stress after they get all riled up over being told "no" about something on Wikipedia. - Vianello (Talk) 05:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soko maya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not be like Justin so please, give me a chance. I will not make the same mistake. I only help wikipedia, but I got blocked. So is there anything I can do to be trusted. Please. I'm not trying to do Meat Puppetry. What can I do to get out of this? Please.

Decline reason:

Talk page editing privileges revoked. You know better. –MuZemike 16:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Noob Saibot Red

I was wandering if you were gonna write an article about Justin Massera.