User talk:Sohcb8

Welcome!

Hello, Sohcb8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 18:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Hi Sohcb8, thanks for adding new information for the IC 814 hijacking page. I would appreciate however, if you can fill in the citations fully. For news articles, you need to specify the newspaper and the date. For books, you need to specify the author, title, publisher, year. The editor has templates for both of them that you can fill. Thanks, Kautilya3 (talk) 15:12, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Sharada Peeth

Hi Sohcb8, I've asked a question about your recent edit on the Sharada Peeth talk page, and I thought I'd drop you a message here just to let you know. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 01:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Notification - Gamergate and gender as well as American Politics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

EvergreenFir (talk) 00:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Liz. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Liz, I am Sohcb8. I apolise if I have not been civil. Could you please point me out where I have not been civil so that I am careful about it in future? Thanks for your quick concern! Maybe if you have time then you could please also take a look at the acts of intimidation and bullying of your friend. I will be grateful. Sohcb8 (talk) 06:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:GorillaWarfare. Thank you. AussieWikiDan (talk) 07:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

POV pushing and personal attacks on other editors will not be tolerated. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that you are being irrational and unreasonable here. I am not trying to push any POV since I only made one edit and did not even revert it. I went to talk page to discussed it. And your other accusation that there was some personal attack is not factual. Please cite the place where I have done that. And please stop collective bullying and censorship. Thanks! Sohcb8 (talk) 06:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote "Those who are in favor of governmental change want to end the interfernece of government in civil life including the leftists control over family courts, government support for single mothers through tax payers hard earned money and other leftist's programs" and that is overt POV pushing that violates Wikipedia's core content policy, the neutral point of view. When you wrote "You are clearly abusing your power and breaking many wikipedia rules", that is an unsubstantiated personal attack, as is addressing another editor as "Feminist" in a pejorative sense. Your block is brief this time but if you resume this type of behavior when your block expires, the next block will be longer. This is a collaborative project based on assuming good faith and editing with a chip on one's shoulder never ends well. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Collapse more personal attacks

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Hi Cullen, EvergreenFir, Liz, SummerPhDv2.0, Daniel and Molly Your act of collective bullying by blocking me on false charges doesn't indicate all of you being honorable or self respecting people. It is only a reflection of cheap, shallow, cowardliness and insecure personality who fears truth and love bullying those who are in weak position. If sadism is what gives enjoyment to you all then so be it and sleep peacefully.

And regarding your POV point on ending the leftist control in governance, I just added the view of some people who are in manosphere. If you had any sincerity to refer to Wikipedia:NPOV then you would have known that it advocates representation of proportional significant views without any editorial bias, which apparently you all have clearly censored. Regarding Feminism, I was not aware that Feminists abhors being called feminists since her twitter profile is full of feminist views. Maybe you are being disrespectful to her by implying the word feminist being some kind of cuss word. Your other point regarding abuse your power is a statement of fact which is clear to all and same is true here but you all live in your own bubble where your think that your bullying and intimidation will change facts. You have only shown that you are a coward and too clever by half.

And as far as truth is concerned for the record, Molly reverted it citing lack of resources while on her talk page EvergreenFir gave the reason that it was due to copying without attribution! Certainly any reasonable person would able to see your collective bullying tactics from the distance.

Lets see if I could retain my account to check how wikipedia policies like Requests for administrator attention, Dispute resolution works on Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents however I can assume that you would not risk going there since that is the signature of cowards. I can safely assume futher blocking since that is how cowards deals with others. Good people always suffer when power is given to coward monkeys. Psychotherapy might help if you want to control your sadistic behavior although I don't think that would be necessary since I don't think you people to have sound interpersonal realtionships due to your personality traits for which this might be helpful. Just bunch of mediocre and failures siting at prominent positions due to cancel culture by bunch of foolish jokers driven by leftists pied pipers to bully meritous and good people to save their privileges through bullying and propaganda. If you people think you have been successful in intimidating me and I will submit to your collective bullying then you are wrong because you all acted typical to how leftists behave, which was expected and known in advance. Try reading the lion and the lamb story and it will become apparent to you all that what I am talking about. It was done just to understand your tactics and how deep the wikipedia is compromised by leftists and how they control it. Sohcb8 (talk) 08:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It the behavior on display above recurs, your block will be extended and you will lose access to this talkpage. Acroterion (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) As the personal attacks are continuing, I have set the block to not expire, and revoked talk page access. – bradv🍁 15:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those certainly were words. I think. Anyway, thank you Bradv. EvergreenFir (talk) 02:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]