User talk:Sohail ariyan

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Symon Sadik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Matal

Varun Tej (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to F2

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Symon Sadik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Nyook. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Symon Sadik, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nyook ✉ 17:37, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal of reliable sources

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Mahiya Mahi does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --Worldbruce (talk) 02:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing behaviour

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Mahiya Mahi, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alisha Pradhan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pure Jay Mon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pure Jay Mon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 11:55, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm GPL93. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pure Jay Mon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 12:12, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sohail ariyan please work on this at Draft:Pure Jay Mon. Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tui Amar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tui Amar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 12:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tui Amar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 15:15, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pure Jay Mon

The article Pure Jay Mon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced. Previous warning to editor about adding unsourced articles and to draftify this article went unheeded.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GPL93 (talk) 15:16, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tui Amar

The article Tui Amar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced. Previous warning to editor about adding unsourced articles and to draftify this article went unheeded.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GPL93 (talk) 15:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Er Beshi Valobasha Jay Na (2013 film)

The article Er Beshi Valobasha Jay Na (2013 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:15, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matal (2018 film)

The article Matal (2018 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gopon Shonket moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gopon Shonket, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jack Frost (talk) 04:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Black Money (2015 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Black Money (2015 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Majavah ^(t/c) 05:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chokher Dekha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chokher Dekha, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 08:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Opare Chondraboti

The article Opare Chondraboti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No source or claim to notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Swapno Chowa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Swapno Chowa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 10:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tomar Kache Rini

The article Tomar Kache Rini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kleuske (talk) 10:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Swapno Chowa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swapno Chowa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swapno Chowa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 10:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tui Shudhu Amar

Hello, Sohail ariyan

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Amkgp and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've proposed an article that you started, Tui Shudhu Amar, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criteria and I believe that the article obviously and uncontroversially does not belong in an encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Amkgp (talk) 10:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Chokher Dekha, you may be blocked from editing. GPL93 (talk) 11:54, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chokher Dekha

The article Chokher Dekha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GPL93 (talk) 11:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gopon Shonket

The article Gopon Shonket has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GPL93 (talk) 12:01, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sweeping removal of reliable sources without explanation

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at Alisha Pradhan, you may be blocked from editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content and unhelpful editing, while failing to communicate at all with others.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ mazca ^talk 16:19, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you appear to be editing in good faith, but your complete refusal to engage with the many concerns about your editing detailed above leaves very few options other than to block you until you indicate you understand the issues. Please review our policies and guidelines, particularly regarding notability and reliable sources, and appeal as described in the template above. I am happy to review your block once you acknowledge these issues, and am also happy for any other administrator to unblock if they're convinced you're willing to edit more constructively. ~ mazca ^talk 16:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matir Pori

The article Matir Pori has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:46, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ojante Valobasha

The article Ojante Valobasha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, non-notable Film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bahaduri (2017 film)

The article Bahaduri (2017 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no reference , non-notable film,fails in WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mayabiny

The article Mayabiny has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khash Zamin

The article Khash Zamin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no reference , non-notable film,fails in WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jol Shewla

The article Jol Shewla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no reference , non-notable film,fails in WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:59, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Action Jasmine

The article Action Jasmine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, no evidence of notability under WP:NFILM or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Black Money (2015 film)

The article Black Money (2015 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, no evidence of notability under WP:NFILM or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 13:05, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matal (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Matal (film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Worldbruce (talk) 13:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]