User talk:Soft serve starfish

Welcome!

Hello, Soft serve starfish, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! –CaroleHenson (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Messing Pixar Infobox

Please explain why you're restoring incorrect infobox edits on the Pixar article. If you're new to Wikipedia and don't know the policies, please make sure you understand them properly before editing.

"Formerly" parameter names means former names, not current names. You can't list current names in the "former" list. That's basic English.
Owner and Parent parameters reflect the current parents, not former parents and owners.
Years in infobox should not be bolded because it gives WP:UNDUE weight to the wrong context.

What logic/policies are you following or are you just vandalising Wikipedia? Starforce¹³ 00:27, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Starforce, I’m just going to address the most impactful statement you made: your assumption that I am “just vandalising Wikipedia.” Frankly, I find your comment rude, insulting, and at the very least bordering on a personal attack if not a personal attack outright. - Soft serve starfish

So, you don't have a reason for reverting the corrections I made? If you're going to insist on reverting correct edits without giving any explanations or taking it to the talk to argue your point, it's hard to think that the intent is not malicious. You're not going to see any well maintained Wikipedia company article that makes years bold or lists current names as former names. If you don't have any solid reason for doing it that way, please do a self-revert so we don't need to keep this going on. Starforce¹³ 00:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Head's up re: edit warring

Just as a heads up, because it looks like you are new to editing WP: If you revert 3 times you could be blocked. See WP:EDITWAR.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]