User talk:Social Studies Rules

Social Studies Rules, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Social Studies Rules! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Westminster diagram

Hello,

I've answered your question on my talk page, because that's more convenient for me if someone else has the same question later. I hope that's OK! --Slashme (talk) 07:56, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hi, when you make edits like you did on Czech Pirate Party, please please can you check that you haven't broken the reference system? In many cases the same source is being used to support several pieces of information on the page, and if you remove the source in one place it creates a reference error. So please be careful. Thanks! Jdcooper (talk) 08:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turkish parliamentary election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Czech Pirate Party infobox

Hi. Recently you repeatedly added "post-capitalism", "anti-nationalism, or "anarchism" into the infobox. These terms are not mentioned in the source and are violating WP:OR. Infobox is for generally accepted facts, not speculations or fringe ideas. Even in the main article body, such statements would have to be directly backed by reliable sources. Re-adding this will be reverted as vandalism, so you are wasting your time. If you believe a source contains useful information (not your personal interpretation), you can discuss it on the talkpage and eventually it can be used if it is factually accurate. Thanks.--Concus Cretus (talk) 10:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I won’t add it, but please do not put (Left-libertarianism) because their leader said they are not libertarians and their leader called it “non-sense”, in the article that you refused to read.--Social Studies Rules (talk) 08:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only place where "libretarian" is mentioned in the article that you provided is a section about a right wing neoliberal party, which has nothing to do with left-libertarianism. There is not even a slightest mention of anything similar to left-libertarianism in that article. Bartos is criticizing neoliberal economics, which is very different from left-libretarianism.--Concus Cretus (talk) 13:54, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Concus Cretus, I agree with you about the libertarian issue (though I am satisfied with SSR's compromise listing it as a faction), but please do not accuse other editors of vandalism when they are clearly editing in good faith. Thanks! Jdcooper (talk) 16:27, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.--Concus Cretus (talk) 01:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with the parliament diagram tool

Hi there,

I see that you left a message about not managing to use the central login to upload images made with the parliament diagram tool, but then removed the message. Is everything working OK for you? --Slashme (talk) 18:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grand National Assembly of Turkey

Hey. Do you have any reliable sources backing that, for example, BBP sit in the group of the AKP? If so, then you are right that BBP could be placed under AKP, but if they are not in the same group, then BBP should be listed separately. Because the fact of the matter is that electoral alliances do not matter once parliament has been elected. That is why they are called electoral alliances; they only have a purpose in the elections themselves. Specifically, pre-election alliances become irrelevant immediately after the election is over. And in Turkey, pre-election alliances only have one purpose, and that is to circumvent the 10% threshold. The parties that ran together in an election under the banner of a single alliance therefore do not automatically sit together, unless they set up a joint caucus. Therefore, neither the Cumhur alliance nor the Millet alliance should be listed, even if cooperation continues between, say, AKP and MHP. To summarize: if you can source that BBP sit with AKP, and DP sit with İYİ, then it can be left as it is now; otherwise they must be separated. Μαρκος Δ 19:43, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish cabinet

Hi Do you think that we should create the article now?--Panam2014 (talk) 19:47, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Next elections

Hi If in Turkey, the parliament will be dissolved, presidential and parliamentary will be organized or only parliamentary?--Panam2014 (talk) 19:47, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Erdogan IV

Hi Did you know the party's membership of each new minister?--Panam2014 (talk) 22:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, why?--Social Studies Rules (talk) 22:57, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To add it to the article. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:00, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How many independents and AKP there are?--Panam2014 (talk) 19:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I only know that Fuat Oktay and Hulusi Akar are independents. Others, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu, Süleyman Soylu, Berat Albayrak, Abdulhamit Gül are AKP. The others I’m not aware of. --Social Studies Rules (talk) 16:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Party of Changes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Herzog

Hi Social Studies Rules,

I notice that you are edit-warring with another editor about the status of Isaac Herzog at the Knesset article. Please note that:

Isaac Herzog is still both an MK and Leader of the Opposition, until August 1, 2018
Edit-warring is not a solution even if you believe that the information you're inserting is correct. There is a talk page discussion which you are part of, please continue your discussion there.

—Ynhockey ^(Talk) 08:48, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]