User talk:SocialTechWorker

Welcome!

Hello, SocialTechWorker! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 14:15, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

January 2023

Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I noticed that you recently removed content from International School of Temple Arts without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 08:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ButterCashier

Your comment is very strange as I actually added content that you have later removed. If it was a mistake feel free to undo it. SocialTechWorker (talk) 08:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Peaceray. An edit that you recently made to International School of Temple Arts seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please review {{cite web}}. Archive.org links need to go into the |archive-url= parameter. Peaceray (talk) 07:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for writing and for updating the format. However, for some reason the link doesn't work when the URL is in the format you have used. To be mentioned that it does work when typing the URL in the address bar - https://web.archive.org/web/20221001190105/https://ista.life/events/auschwitz-poland-wild-love-love-from-the-ashes-jul-2020?fbclid=IwAR1_xftQ_1jrGU8futZ8EVUv_mJKFc-VlXS_wx6_2zWVUUR481qBPPQyGIQ SocialTechWorker (talk) 07:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Peaceray SocialTechWorker (talk) 08:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Part of the problem is in your last edit, you had inserted a line feed into the title, which caused a error, {{cite web}}: line feed character in |title= at position 18 (help). You may have been alerted to the problem if you had previewed your changes before committing them. This is the why I flagged it as a test edit, although I could have used the {{uw-preview}} warning instead.

You may want to practice citation formatting in your user sandbox. Please see About the sandbox for instructions on how to use your sandbox.

Using the Firefox browser on a PC, I cannot access a viewable page either by clicking on the link or by pasting it into the address bar. Archive.org strips off the ?fbclid=IwAR1_xftQ_1jrGU8futZ8EVUv_mJKFc-VlXS_wx6_2zWVUUR481qBPPQyGIQ portion of the URL, leaving https://web.archive.org/web/20221015021434/https://ista.life/events/auschwitz-poland-wild-love-love-from-the-ashes-jul-2020 in the address bar. Peaceray (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on International School of Temple Arts

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page International School of Temple Arts, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:39, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:39, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

Hi, do you have any connection with the International School of Temple Arts? By "any connection" I mean having any ties to the people who work in that organization and/or even people who are critical of them (e.g. the people who are accusing them of misconducts). If you do, that's fine per Wikipedia's rules, but you have to disclose that publicly if you want to edit that article.

For more info, please read WP:COI. SparklyNights 23:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Ae245. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Yahya Ayyash, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ae245 (talk) 04:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Message (Coates book). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Οἶδα (talk) 22:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ta-Nehisi Coates. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Οἶδα (talk) 22:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]