User talk:Social25062

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Social25062, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 13:14, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Flag carrier, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Flag carrier, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Flag carrier, you may be blocked from editing. Your latest edits were reverted as you removed citations provided by another user. Furthermore, the removal of Virgin Australia from the list was totally subjective as there were sources supporting them. "In this world, both Qantas and Virgin are designated national carriers for Australia." is clearly read in the corresponding citation. Jetstreamer ^Talk 19:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We appreciate your enthusiasm but it seems you do not understand what a flag carrier is: it has nothing to do with the strength of an airline's fleet, and even if this was the case you need to find a source that supoports it. Moreover, you do not understand what WP:V means. You need to add a source that directly supports the claims: the inclusion of the words "national airline" or "flag carrier" are a must in these sources. Your most recent edit was reverted, as you added a number of references that had nothing to do with the article. Flag carrier is an article listing national airlines and the references in them support those entries. It is not an article for providing details of All Nippon Airways (ANA) or Virgin Australia. By the way, your addition of ANA also violated a Wikipedia policy, namely WP:NOR, please read it carefully. You also added a number of unsourced claims to Flag carrier as well.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Flag carrier; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. I will report you for warring if you continue reinstating the same edits without prior discussions here or at the article's talk. Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Flag carrier, you may be blocked from editing. Jetstreamer ^Talk 15:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Flag carrier. Jetstreamer ^Talk 15:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I think it's time to take action on this user. Their recent edits to Flag carrier [1], either logged in or logged out, keep the disruptive pattern described above.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Persistent disruptive editing from User:Social25062. Thank you.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits and for signature forgery as you did here.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Social25062, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Bingobro (Chat) 09:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Social25062 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'd originally intended to describe that Virgin Australia has been no longer flag carrier at flag carrier page. However, User:Jetstreamer persisted Virgin Australia is flag carrier by cling to single obsolete source in 2014. I replied and replied, Jetstreamer got angry and eventually led to edit war, which made my account blocked . So I had to create another account to prove Virgin Australia isn't flag carrier, which led to be sockpuppet. As a result, of course, the sockpuppet account was also blocked. In fact, I once sometimes editted flag carrier's article without checking guidelines and listing sources. I regret forgetting guidelines and making sockpuppet. After my account unblocked, I'll never use sockpuppet account and will make agreement with Jetstreamer, and will contribute English wikipedia by introducing various Japanese articles(Such as Japanese old Electric Locomotives built in England and United States, Japanese abandoned airports, and Korean architects built during Japanese occupation) in English which are yet exist in English Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

This wasn't a one-time thing, was it? You created two separate sockpuppet accounts across several weeks. Given your abusive behaviour, your best bet is to follow the offer outlined at WP:SO. Yamla (talk) 13:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.