User talk:SobaNoodleForYou
Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:
- Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
- If I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
- Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
- Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
- To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
- You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Anti-vandal scripts?
[edit]{{helpme}}
I've been using Lupin's Anti-Vandal tool for about a day, but then I made an edit to my monobook.js that somehow stopped it from working. I reverted my own edit and bypassed my browser cache, but it still won't work. Also, Twinkle won't work for me even after I turned it on in my preferences. I've also tried putting it on my monobook.js but that won't work either. Can anyone please help me? SobaNoodleForYou 20:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- I looks like what you are trying to do is copy the code directly into your monobook, and it doesn't look like all of it is there anyways. What you should do is use the importScript code to import the scripts. Look at my monobook to see how I have it. Hopefully that will help you. Even having a single ';' missing will break your entire monobook.js --Terrillja talk 20:29, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- It still seems kinda weird to me that it worked yesterday, but after editing and reverting my monobook.js, it stopped working. Anyway, I tried putting in what I want, and it still doesn't work. I bypass my cache every time I update my monobook.js. (I use Firefox, by the way, if that helps.) Is there still something wrong with the code? And thanks for helping. SobaNoodleForYou 20:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- The code looks right now, you may have to completely clear your cache to get it to work. You also don't have to add the helpme, I'm watching this page and will stick around until we get this to work. I think it would be faster if you log onto IRC so you can get faster responses.
- It still seems kinda weird to me that it worked yesterday, but after editing and reverting my monobook.js, it stopped working. Anyway, I tried putting in what I want, and it still doesn't work. I bypass my cache every time I update my monobook.js. (I use Firefox, by the way, if that helps.) Is there still something wrong with the code? And thanks for helping. SobaNoodleForYou 20:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- By the looks of your question, I think it would be best to have you log on to IRC. This way I can get others on #wikipedia-en-help to help you in addition to me. This link will direct you to a web based IRC client. This way you don't have to download anything to talk to us! We are waiting for you.--Terrillja talk 20:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have tried clearing my cache but that won't work either. In any case, I can't stay on the Net any longer today, so I will log into IRC tomorrow. Thanks! SobaNoodleForYou 21:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- By the looks of your question, I think it would be best to have you log on to IRC. This way I can get others on #wikipedia-en-help to help you in addition to me. This link will direct you to a web based IRC client. This way you don't have to download anything to talk to us! We are waiting for you.--Terrillja talk 20:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
your sig
[edit]is 450 characters. WP:SIG states that only 255 characters are allowed in your sig. Please change it. SimonKSK 22:03, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Message from WikiProject Emo
[edit]Hello!
You may be interested to know that WikiProject Emo has recently undergone a major revitalization. Please visit the project page to see our new look and check out some of our helpful new features, such as the Assessment Department and the Collaboration of the month.
We are currently holding a roll call to help gauge how many active project members we have. Please visit the project's talk page and add your signature to the roll sheet to express your continued interest in the project. Also, if you have not already done so, please take a minute to add your name to the Participants page along with a brief summary of your emo-related interests, so that other project members will be better able to collaborate with you. If you do not add your signature to the roll sheet by March 31, 2009 your name will be moved to our list of inactive members. We may also take the liberty of removing the project userbox from your userpage if it appears there, to prevent you from automatically appearing in Category:WikiProject Emo members. Of course you are free to rejoin the project and re-add the userbox at any time if you would like to become active in the project again.
Thank you and we hope you will continue to support WikiProject Emo!
 | You are receiving this message because you have previously identified yourself as a member of WikiProject Emo, either because your name appears on the Participants page or because you have placed the project userbox on your user page. As a courtesy, if you have left the project, retired from Wikipedia, or simply no longer wish to be an active project member, please remove the userbox from your user page. This will remove you from Category:WikiProject Emo members and help the project to keep its active membership list up-to-date. |
--IllaZilla (talk) 07:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Re:The Maine
[edit]I don't really see redlinks as an aesthetic concern; what makes them unattractive? In any case, redlinks are useful to track things which do not yet have articles; I use them all the time to find needed topics (and that's what they're for, after all). There's certainly nothing unnecessary about them; if anything, the laundry list of bluelinked bands is less useful (those are surely underused links, but no one would think of delinking them, and not without good reason). But in any case, this is really not worth discussing at length; it's three links, for Pete's sake. There are better things to focus our energies on. Chubbles (talk) 06:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
March 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Hey Monday has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Fastily (talk) 02:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't want to come off as rude, but I don't see what was so unconstructive about my edit. Could you please explain? SobaNoodleForYou 02:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry - I had interpreted the wording as something else while reverting. My bad - Fastily (talk) 02:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- No problem, we're all human. SobaNoodleForYou 02:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry - I had interpreted the wording as something else while reverting. My bad - Fastily (talk) 02:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative
[edit]| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi SobaNoodleForYou! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! |
Invitation to WikiProject Post-hardcore
[edit]
|
WikiProject Emo has moved! Because of your participation in the old WikiProject Emo, you are invited to join the WikiProject Post-hardcore, a collaborative effort focused on improving Wikipedia's coverage of post-hardcore and emo music. Simply click here and add your username to the list to accept. This is a one-time mass message requested by User:Ozhu. 12:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)